Reply With Quote
Yep. But, media don't talk about that. It's verboten.
Random thought.
The Nate trade now seems like a kneejerk reaction to a midseason slump.
Yep. But, media don't talk about that. It's verboten.
Sounds crazy, but I think they shouldn't have let starbury leave. Dude played really well for them against Orlando.
Boston's trying to win the playoffs slam dunk contest. Thats why they got Robinson. Also got Finley to help Nate out on his cartwheel dunk.
Eddie's animated screaming after a jumpshot to give Boston a 10-7 lead in the 1st would have really helped fire the team up and intimidate the Cavs.
Eddie is a chucking guard just like Nate. He's not going to get playing time eitherway because Tony Allen is much more serviceable than both.
I don't get why they traded for Nate, guy's a scrub who plays well 1 in every 10 games.
Eddie House, however, has proven capable of taking and making clutch shots. During their le run, he got lots of 4th-quarter PT in close games. Robinson is a circus act. He's never proven a damn thing besides being annoying. I hate saying it as House is a Sun Devil and I'm a Wildcat fan, but House really is a vocal leader. Every contending team was better for having House than for not.
I agree, but I can see why they made the trade. It just didn't pan out well, it seems.
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)
Posting Permissions
