Reply With Quote
We can live with Amare (23 points 6-15) and Nash (6 assist & 5 TO)
It wasn't the key in game 2
As you know Spurs were within margin to take to lead in the 4th quarter but the Suns prevailed in each of the first 2 games..
People want to point out Spurs need Manu to put up more points, or that Spurs need more 3 point shooters. I disagree it comes down to something more simple.
In both games Spurs closed out each of them by going small. And low and behold Spurs were unable to get a stop.
Suns repeatedly ran the Nash/Amare pick and roll every time down the floor possession after possession, pulling the Spurs' aged All-NBA defender away from the basket. This left the lane vulnerable to Amare's swift roll to the basket, which lead to Amare getting fouled, Amare getting a layup/dunk or Nash laying the ball up.
Spurs need McDyess in the game guarding Amare in the scenario, because for one he is more agile and effective than Duncan to hedge and recover more efficiently and it allows Duncan to play the help side role that has earned him All-Defensive honors year after year.
This slight adjustment needs to be made if Spurs want to be able to get stops down the stretch. IMO
NOTE: Posted later thanks to Spursfanfromafar finding this video this morning
http://espn.go.com/blog/truehoop/pos...sive-liability
Last edited by MaNu4Tres; 05-07-2010 at 11:00 AM.
We can live with Amare (23 points 6-15) and Nash (6 assist & 5 TO)
It wasn't the key in game 2
In the 4th quarter Spurs were unable to stop the Amare/Nash pick and roll. Whether it was Amare getting fouled, Nash laying the ball up, or our wings from the weak side cheating blatantly, making an emphasis to stop Amare's roll, which made the rotations late to the shooters.
I'm not trying to point out the whole game. I'm pointing out the last 6-7 minutes of the 4th quarter.
Spurs were unable to get a stop and the beginning of each possession by the Suns was initiated by the Amare/Nash pick and roll taking Tim away from the basket.
http://espn.go.com/blog/truehoop/pos...sive-liability only buttresses your argument.
Didn't see that thank you Spursfanfromafar
That is exactly my point.
I really do not think it is so much Duncan being a liability because that implies that someone else on the team would better. Duncan is both helping out Parker (or Hill) and trying to rotate back to guard Amare by himself without anyone rotating over to help him. Dice would not be better at this scenario. Whomever is guarding Nash needs to put better defensive pressure on him in the first place.
While I agree that the Nash-Amare pick-n-roll is killing us, and that we are desperate for some 3-pt shooting, I also need to point out that in the past we used to hang a bunch of stupid fouls on Amare and make him leave the game for extended periods. Amare is great on offense, but he's not a great defender or shot-blocker--that's a big point of weakness, since the suns have no other great interior defenders or shot-blockers either. Here as against Dallas, the goal must be to penetrate, penetrate, penetrate. Penetration leads to fouls and and-ones, which look like the only 3-pt plays we'll be getting this series. Tony, Manu, and Jefferson, I'm looking directly at you here. And guess what, that's what you all do!
While I do absolutely expect a monster win for SA tonight (20+ pts), if they don't remember to penetrate constantly from here on out, Suns will take this series for sure.
Pop should realize that he's not going to out-small the Suns. By closing out the game with a small lineup, he's playing into their hands. The Spurs need to attack their weakest defensive links - Amare and Nash.
The hope that small ball brought Pop at the beginning of the 4th Quarter in Game 1 was a false positive. The Spurs erased a 10 point lead going into the 4th quarter in just a few minutes by using small ball.
Zone defense = no high pick and roll.
Keep Duncan inside.
Let Amare beat you on midrange jumpers, if he can.
No chance on happening.
Pop hates the zone.
I highly doubt Pop would go with a zone. but hey, that might help in guarding the Nash-Amare pick and roll. They just have to play better defense. Nash is dancing around and hitting open guys and Nash is getting to the basket, which should never happen. Then you have the pick and roll, where Amare will kill you or Nash could hit a jumper. That, to me, is the only problems.
Suns have killed teams playing zone against them. You play zone against teams that don't shoot the 3 pointer well, essentially forcing them to shoot. Phoenix would have no problem with Nash, Richardson, Frye, and Dudley shooting the open 3's that the zone would bring.
McDyess covers Amare and then Tim must to go outside to cover Frye.
Not very good matchup when Timmy must to go and defend permieter.
Frankly I don't know what a big adjustments there are for the spurs to make.
They need to play better and execute better. Or making some new set plays
Big adjustments are for example changing Bowen from guarding paul to Stojakovic
That change one of the most important concepts Hornets had.
If Tim guards Frye on the perimeter, the Suns will gladly take Amare 1-on-1 vs McDyess any day of the week. Definitely pick your poison. If I am the Spurs, I dare Frye to beat us, especially when he is on the road. He shoots 7 or 8% worse on the road this year. For a while, it was 20% difference.
Much rather have Frye take a semi-contested 3 than Amare or Nash have free easy look at point blank range.
Gee, you'd think the Spurs would have seen a Suns offense that runs the pick and roll with Nash and Amare surrounded by three point shooters.
+1 It's not like this is something new to Pop.
I don't know if it's better to have duncan running 25ft out from the basket.
1. That's no comfort zone for Tim
2. Our defense gets lost
3. Tim is our best rebounder/ and with rebs we had quite big problems those two games when we lost
Exactly. If you get beat by Frye, sobeit. You can't take the interior defense and rebounding away from the perimeter.
+1 It's not like this is something new to Pop.
Nash is 100x the passer that Parker is in the P&R, and that's the problem that you have defending it. He makes passes that most players wouldn't even attempt.
Nash is so good at it becuse he is a shooter as well. many time he can fake defenders shooting not shooting passing not passing. And he can pass when the play seems to be over. Then all of sudden Suns have a passing lane that ends with points for them.
Nash is 100x the passer that Parker is in the P&R, and that's the problem that you have defending it. He makes passes that most players wouldn't even attempt.
seriously, DEATH TO THE PICK'N'ROLL!!!!!
You've gotta turn Nash into a scorer......
Go under that pick every time.
I like this theory. Nash under ten assists usually means a loss for PHX. Go under, stay at home on the other guys, and make Nash knock jump shots all night long. I know he's a good shooter, but it keeps the other guys out of rhythm and makes Nash play out of his comfort zone and keeps him out of the paint.
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)
Posting Permissions
