Reply With Quote
thats fkn alot of money going to waste, wouldnt it be better just to use the army instead...
i wonder what the pay scales these contractors are on and how many men are on the ground...
May 6 (Bloomberg) -- KBR Inc. was selected for a no-bid contract worth as much as $568 million through 2011 for military support services in Iraq, the Army said.
The Army announced its decision yesterday only hours after the Justice Department said it will pursue a lawsuit accusing the Houston-based company of taking kickbacks from two subcontractors on Iraq-related work. The Army also awarded the work to KBR over objections from members of Congress, who have pushed the Pentagon to seek bids for further logistics contracts.
The Justice Department said the government will join a suit filed by whistleblowers alleging that two freight-forwarding firms gave KBR transportation department employees kickbacks in the form of meals, drinks, sports tickets and golf outings.
“Defense contractors cannot take advantage of the ongoing war effort by accepting unlawful kickbacks,” Assistant Attorney General Tony West said in a statement.
KBR, the Army’s largest contractor in Iraq, will review the litigation when it is received and “will continue to cooperate with the government,” company spokeswoman Heather Browne said in an e-mail. “Gifts of dinners, baseball tickets and similar items would violate KBR policies and KBR was not aware of these violations.”
KBR will continue to provide services in Iraq such as housing, meals, laundry, showers, water purification and bathroom cleaning under the new order, which was placed under a military contract KBR won in late 2001, shortly after the U.S. invaded Afghanistan.
‘Appropriate Safeguards’
The Army has “reviewed the government’s notice to intervene” in the whistleblower lawsuit, Army spokesman Dan Carlson said. “We feel we have appropriate safeguards in place” to protect the government’s interests.
The no-bid work order is unusual because the Army, at the insistence of Congress, has since April 2008 put all logistics orders to bid, pitting KBR against Falls Church, Virginia-based DynCorp International Inc. and Irving, Texas-based Fluor Corp.
The Army didn’t put this work out for bids because U.S. commanders in Iraq advised against it, saying that enlisting a new company would be too disruptive as the U.S withdraws, Army program director Lee Thompson said in an interview before the Justice Department action was announced.
Odierno’s View
The view of General Ray Odierno, the U.S. military commander in Iraq, was crucial to the decision, Army Chief of Staff General George Casey told reporters today.
“Odierno said, ‘I’ve got three million pieces of equipment I’ve got to get out of Iraq, I’ve got 100 or so bases to close, I’ve got to move 80,000-plus people out of here and you want me to change horses in the middle of the stream?’” Casey recounted.
The U.S. force in Iraq is scheduled to shrink from 94,000 troops today to 50,000 by August, with a complete withdrawal by December 2011.
The Army, in its statement yesterday, said putting to bid an order for 18 months’ work and making the transition to a new contractor would cost at least $77 million. The KBR work order will be awarded by Aug. 31, said Mike Hutchison, deputy director of Army logistics contracting.
Earlier U.S. Lawsuit
The lawsuit is the second government action this year against KBR. The U.S. sued the company on April 1, alleging that it used private armed security guards in Iraq between 2003 and 2006 in violation of its Army contract and then improperly billed for their services.
Before yesterday’s Justice Department announcement, the Army had said in an e-mailed statement that it was aware of the April lawsuit and would use “additional oversight measures to ensure only reasonable, allowable costs are paid” under the new work order.
The new lawsuit, filed in a Texas federal court, was based on information from two whistleblowers who work in the air cargo industry, the Justice Department statement said. The whistleblowers can get a portion of any money the Justice Department obtains in the case.
Senate Objections
KBR’s no-bid work order drew criticism from two U.S. senators even before it was announced.
Senator Claire McCaskill, the Missouri Democrat who heads a subcommittee that oversees military contracting, and the panel’s ranking Republican, Susan Collins of Maine, wrote Defense Secretary Robert Gates on April 30 urging the Army against “continued reliance” on KBR in light of the Justice Department’s April lawsuit.
“The Army has a big burden to demonstrate that a decision to not compete is in the best interest of the military and American taxpayers,” McCaskill said in a statement last night. “We will hold their feet to the fire and continue to demand accountability on this decision.”
Under the new compe ive-bid approach, KBR on March 2 won a one-year, $571 million contract with four option years that, if exercised, could be worth as much as $2.77 billion.
That contract calls for KBR to provide services including transportation and postal operations. DynCorp initially protested the award and then dropped its objections.
thats fkn alot of money going to waste, wouldnt it be better just to use the army instead...
i wonder what the pay scales these contractors are on and how many men are on the ground...
change we can believe in
Eh, at least this cash-cow comes with an expiration date.....The Army didn’t put this work out for bids because U.S. commanders in Iraq advised against it, saying that enlisting a new company would be too disruptive as the U.S withdraws, Army program director Lee Thompson said in an interview before the Justice Department action was announced.
...Haliburton will pay for the Gulf, just like BP..
The General had a point that one doesn't change horses in the middle of the river.
and Halliburton is a near-monoply supplier of suhc services. What other company could be signed up to deliver a $500M services contract on short notice?
$500M is simply a continuation of the momentum of bogus Repug war-for-oil, which is debt financed, not tax financed, and a commitment to waste $2T-$3T for absolutely no gain for the USA in security. Iraq will blow apart later, if not sooner.
Trash talk Magic Negro for $500M when dubya lied his way into a $2T war? GMAFB
...eh, wing-nuts are trying to justify the billions of dollars of waste in Iraq over the last 7 years....Obama is giving Halliburton $500m...we gave them billions! - check, mate..and Halliburton is a near-monoply supplier of suhc services. What other company could be signed up to deliver a $500M services contract on short notice?
WTF?! Why are we giving these people 500m? If they are going to succeed in their mission they need billions, I don't understand.
Also, please tell us how many PMCs vs US Military in Iraq? I'm sure the number is hilariously offensive.
Pretty depressing, but at least there was no conflict of of interest that can yet be determined.
We will just mark it down as another Obama lie. Libs will turn their heads again because Obama is doing it, not Bush.
Nor was there in the Bush administration.
this thread is remarkably empty of leftwingers' normal runs.
Cheney totally notwithstanding, naturally.
I guess the following stories aren't conflicts but they do look pretty bad. The list isn't comprehensive, but is the result of fairly casual googling. It's not like there's nothing wrong with Halliburton, that we haven't known for awhile by now.
Consider this. See this. And this. This too. War risk surcharge. The links in the slavery thread related to Halliburton. Substandard food. Unsafe water. Covering up gang rape.
For the record, no-bid contracting still sucks.
Nah, throw him in. Where's the conflict?
And, these relate to a conflict of interest how?
I didn't say there was one. It looks bad, tho.
Did I say they did?And, these relate to a conflict of interest how?
Just providing a little background information for people who might not be too familiar with Halliburton.
Sometimes, you can't help how things look but, Vice President Cheney went above and beyond to demonstrate a separation between himself and Halliburton during his time in office.
1) He irrevocably assigned all stock profits to charity. About a $9 million dollar donation to three charities.
2) He insured his Deferred Compensation annuity thereby making it unaffected by the rise or fall in Halliburton fortunes.
3) He recused himself from all administration matters involving his former company. (by the way, this is the only thing he was legally required to do. Number 1 and 2 were purely voluntary.)
Halliburton will surely take care of head for lying the US into bogus war-for-oil that Halliburton scammed $Bs from.
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)
Posting Permissions
