Reply With Quote
I guess that's an option if it ends up not coattailing UT to another conference.
UTAH decides not to enter the PAC 10
I guess that's an option if it ends up not coattailing UT to another conference.
It makes a ton more sense. Texas Tech could then schedule BCS opponents, wait...
Y'know, there are three BCS teams in the MWC. Just sayin'.TT would still be bowing down to a lot of teams.
Still would be nuts for TT to go to the MWC. Why take that kind of paycut?
Hanging onto UT until grim death makes the most sense now.
+1hanging onto ut until grim death makes the most sense now.
actually with USC getting hammered, the Pac 10 looks like an easy enough conference schedule for TT......especially now that pansy Colorado has joined.It makes a ton more sense. Texas Tech could then schedule BCS opponents, wait...
BLAKE HAS NO !!!
With seasons like 70-3, the scandals, and Dan Hawkins, the two consistent teams who have been colorado's have been A2M and TTech.
They can have 'em. A&M to SEC, Tech to MWC and then Kansas/Kansas State to Pac-10.
That would make for a nice balance in football division to division, then, like the Big East, not have divisions for basketball, and then have to play your "rival" every year and half the conference every other year twice.
That would be disgusting for basketball. Kansas, Kansas State, Texas, UCLA, Arizona, Washington, Cal, Oklahoma, Oklahoma State, Oregon, Arizona State... these are all teams who've made the tournament and/or made pretty deep runs in the tournament within the last five years, with about half even more recently. It would be as compe ive as the Big East.
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)
Posting Permissions
