Reply With Quote
It's only an asterisk if you can prove the fouls that were called on Boston weren't actually fouls.
The reality is they WERE fouls. The refs just weren't calling them early in the game.
Celtics should've won this game but the refs interfered. Thus an asterisks.
It's only an asterisk if you can prove the fouls that were called on Boston weren't actually fouls.
The reality is they WERE fouls. The refs just weren't calling them early in the game.
*
Three teams now have the *
Spurs
cHeat
Lakers
If you are saying those were fouls, the Lakers made a bunch of fouls that weren't called the whole game. It's a sham how inconsistent the refs were. It's funny that Stern picks the worst refs for the big games.
Only asterisked champion in my book in the 2006 Miami cHeat.
How predictable
Three teams now have the *
Spurs
cHeat
Lakers
heres another asterisk for ya:
biggest choke jobs in nba history.
dallas mavericks (*1)
dallas mavericks (*2)
*1-nba finals
*2-1 seed losing to the 8 seed
are you guys still saying those were not fouls?
<- Still doesn't understand the asterisk placed on the '99 championship. It's not like the Spurs played a shortened season while their opponents played 82 games.
it'll mean even less when they lower the number of games per season, which they've discussed doing next year.
Good idea, considering there are too many teams for this economy (or salaries/expenses => ticket prices are too high), players get hurt for no reason and coaches rest players who arent injured during the dog days of January
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)
Posting Permissions
