Results 1 to 25 of 25
  1. #1
    Believe.
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    Dec 2008
    Post Count
    696
    ok. i think we all need to dream, because hope fades last. i did not check the salaries for fear that we may not pull this off financially speaking. however, assuming splitter comes in and we get at least to the semi-finals again, and we look like a solid team missing one great player, do the city of san antonio and the spurs organization have enough to convince carmelo to come and play for our team next year?

    i assume this would only be possible if we do not keep parker and knowing that mcdyess said he may retire at the end of this coming season. would that bring enough cap flexibility?

    we have seen stars decline new york and brooklin and more money to play for a serious championship contender. if the spurs would have made a good run at the championship this coming year, is that enough to make carmelo get here?

    pipe dreams are fun!!!

  2. #2
    fuk yo team clown tp2021's Avatar
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    Sep 2007
    Post Count
    5,452
    Put down the pipe

  3. #3
    Watching the collapse benefactor's Avatar
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    Jul 2008
    Post Count
    42,233
    lol

  4. #4
    Kidd-Gilchrist Damn Chieflion's Avatar
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    Dec 2008
    Post Count
    10,797
    Crack dream.

  5. #5
    New Blood BadOne's Avatar
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    Apr 2009
    Post Count
    436
    Money wise, it might work if we moved Tony, however there'd be no significant chance he'd sign an extension with us. The moment his contract expired, he'd be out of here just like Parker might.

    Puff, puff, pass...

  6. #6
    I'm on a roll sa_butta's Avatar
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    Jan 2005
    Post Count
    10,005
    Money wise, it might work if we moved Tony, however there'd be no significant chance he'd sign an extension with us. The moment his contract expired, he'd be out of here just like Parker might.

    Puff, puff, pass...
    I think moving Tony would be a mistake...Would you be ready to hand over the reigns to George Hill after he got torched by Nash??
    Even if it meant bringing in Carmelo we still need a true point to handle the compe ion in the west...with guys like CP3, Nash and Williams.

  7. #7
    Scrumtrulescent
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    Nov 2006
    Post Count
    9,724
    No, we can't get Carmelo. How about Richard Jefferson instead? Too bad, it's what you're getting.

  8. #8
    New Blood BadOne's Avatar
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    Apr 2009
    Post Count
    436
    I think moving Tony would be a mistake...Would you be ready to hand over the reigns to George Hill after he got torched by Nash??
    Even if it meant bringing in Carmelo we still need a true point to handle the compe ion in the west...with guys like CP3, Nash and Williams.
    Very true. Too bad there wasn't a decent PG in the draft we could've moved on.

  9. #9
    I'm on a roll sa_butta's Avatar
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    Jan 2005
    Post Count
    10,005
    No, we can't get Carmelo. How about Richard Jefferson instead? Too bad, it's what you're getting.
    Honestly we are lucky if RJ comes back, if he was to leave who will fill his void?? Rookie James Anderson?? unproven in the NBA...Ill take my chances with RJ...he can only get better.

  10. #10
    Scrumtrulescent
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    Nov 2006
    Post Count
    9,724
    Honestly we are lucky if RJ comes back, if he was to leave who will fill his void?? Rookie James Anderson?? unproven in the NBA...Ill take my chances with RJ...he can only get better.
    No doubt. I agree with you. RJ isn't ideal, but there isn't a better option available.

  11. #11
    Believe.
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    Jun 2008
    Post Count
    6,599
    short answer: no. long answer: no.

  12. #12
    Spur-taaaa TDMVPDPOY's Avatar
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    Feb 2005
    Post Count
    41,384
    I do the trade, we need a thug on this team who runs away in a fight

  13. #13
    silverblk mystix
    Guest
    ...sir...please...

    take two steps back...and

    DROP THE CHALUPA!

  14. #14
    1.21 JIGGAWATTS! Lebowski Brickowski's Avatar
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    Mar 2006
    Post Count
    1,106
    No doubt. I agree with you. RJ isn't ideal, but there isn't a better option available.
    There isn't a 3-5 mil/yr long, sf who can defend and hit the 3?

  15. #15
    Scrumtrulescent
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    Nov 2006
    Post Count
    9,724
    There isn't a 3-5 mil/yr long, sf who can defend and hit the 3?
    With the MLE being used to sign Splitter, a $3-$5 mil/yr SF is out of the Spurs price range. BAE is the best they can do, and that's only $2 mil.

  16. #16
    Veteran spursfan1000's Avatar
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    Apr 2009
    Post Count
    3,698

  17. #17
    Spur-taaaa TDMVPDPOY's Avatar
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    Feb 2005
    Post Count
    41,384
    keep fkn rj, and sign barnes to LLE

    i doubt barnes will take the vet or minimum or else he can just goto miami and play with them, we need a thug on this team that keeps the other players from gettin physical with us

  18. #18
    Every game is game 1 Seventyniner's Avatar
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    Jul 2009
    Post Count
    10,608
    With the MLE being used to sign Splitter, a $3-$5 mil/yr SF is out of the Spurs price range. BAE is the best they can do, and that's only $2 mil.
    Do you think that RJ for a trade exception is now out of the question?

  19. #19
    obligatory troll smasher Flux451's Avatar
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    Feb 2008
    Post Count
    1,311
    Crack Pipe Dream

  20. #20
    Scrumtrulescent
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    Nov 2006
    Post Count
    9,724
    Do you think that RJ for a trade exception is now out of the question?
    It's not out of the question, but I don't think it's a very likely scenario. Never did. You only get the trade exception if you can send RJ to a team under the cap who wouldn't have to send any salary back your way. To do that you need to have some team with cap room have interest in RJ, and have RJ have interest in that team. Thus far, there's no signs whatsoever that those two conditions are lining up.

    Even if you do get the TE, you're only half way there. You've still got to go out and convince some team that it's in their best interests to literally just give away a quality player. That's not going to be easy.

    You can S&T RJ to a team over the cap and get a player in return, but should anyone here get excited over trading RJ in return for some player who another team would rather have RJ instead of?

    I'd have no complaints whatsoever if the Spurs find a way to pull it off, but I just don't see it.

  21. #21
    Veteran
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    Apr 2010
    Post Count
    1,140
    No but I wouldn't mind smoke that stuff u are smokin

  22. #22
    Robert Horry mode ohmwrecker's Avatar
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    Jan 2009
    Post Count
    12,135
    It's going to be a terrible thread kind of day. I can feel it.

  23. #23
    Believe.
    My Team
    Los Angeles Lakers
    Join Date
    Feb 2006
    Post Count
    93
    Crack Pipe Dream

  24. #24
    selbstverständlich Agloco's Avatar
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    Jan 2007
    Post Count
    9,019
    There isn't a 3-5 mil/yr long, sf who can defend and hit the 3?
    Wrong question. How will SA pay anyone besides RJ 3-5 mil/year?

  25. #25
    Every game is game 1 Seventyniner's Avatar
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    Jul 2009
    Post Count
    10,608
    It's not out of the question, but I don't think it's a very likely scenario. Never did. You only get the trade exception if you can send RJ to a team under the cap who wouldn't have to send any salary back your way. To do that you need to have some team with cap room have interest in RJ, and have RJ have interest in that team. Thus far, there's no signs whatsoever that those two conditions are lining up.

    Even if you do get the TE, you're only half way there. You've still got to go out and convince some team that it's in their best interests to literally just give away a quality player. That's not going to be easy.

    You can S&T RJ to a team over the cap and get a player in return, but should anyone here get excited over trading RJ in return for some player who another team would rather have RJ instead of?

    I'd have no complaints whatsoever if the Spurs find a way to pull it off, but I just don't see it.
    I see your point. It seemed like the Nets or Clippers were possibilities for RJ, but you're probably right that they're unlikely.

    The main use of a TE might be at the trade deadline, if a high payroll team is underachieving and looking to dump salary. Chris Paul is a pipe dream, but Iguodala, Varejao, or even Granger may not be. It might cost Hill, Blair, and/or future picks, but there should be possibilities.

Thread Information

Users Browsing this Thread

There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •