Reply With Quote
The life of this dude is ed up - can't say whether I feel bad for him or wish him he was sentenced.
First his pregnant wife gets killed by a maniac, then he rapes a 13 year old.
http://ca.eonline.com/uberblog/b1898...free_last.html
The Swiss government this morning announced that it has rejected the U.S.' request to extradite the director back to Los Angeles so that he could finally face up to the charge he fled the country over back in 1977—namely, having sex with a 13-year-old girl.
"The 76-year-old French-Polish film director Roman Polanski will not be extradited to the U.S.A.," the Swiss Justice Ministry said in a statement this morning. "The freedom-restricting measures against him have been revoked.
"He's a free man."
The Ministry firmly pointed the finger of blame at U.S. officials when announcing the shocking decision this morning, saying they failed to provide confidential testimony from his sentencing hearings back in the late '70s.
As they see it, Polanski—initially indicted on six felony counts, including rape by use of drugs, sodomy and child molesting, but pleading guilty to just one count of unlawful sexual intercourse—already served his time when he underwent 42 days of a 90-day psychiatric evaluation. His evaluator declared him unlikely to offend again, but when the judge overseeing the case threatened to make him see out 90 days in jail, he fled the country the night before his sentencing.
The Ministry today said the 42 days was adequate for the crime based on the testimony given by the psychiatrist evaluating Polanski and thus, since they don't think the director has any remainder of a sentence to serve out, will not send him back to the U.S.
"If this were the case, Roman Polanski would actually have already served his sentence and therefore both the proceedings on which the U.S. extradition request is founded and the request itself would have no foundation," the Ministry said.
Swiss officials made a point to also note in their announcement that they were not dismissing his crime nor deciding whether Polanski was guilty or innocent of the charges, but said that they had no choice but to deny the extradition request due to "the persisting doubts concerning the presentation of the facts of the case."
"This is not about qualifying a crime. That is not our duty. This is not about deciding on guilt or innocence."
That red tape gets ya every time.
In any case, it may soon be déjà vu all over again, depending on whether or not the Oscar winner now leaves Switzerland. While he is still unable to return to the U.S., stateside officials could make another attempt at extradition should Polanski head to another country that would be willing to go through the whole rigmarole all over again.
However, it's likely he'll return to France, which does not extradite its citizens.
And the U.S. Department of Justice isn't too happy about it.
"Whenever the United States seeks an individual's extradition, we do so on the basis that our request is supported by the facts and the terms of our treaty," Laura Sweeney, spokeswoman for the U.S. Department of Justice, said in a statement. "That is true in this case as well. We believe the extradition request submitted by the United States was fully supported by the evidence, met the requirements of the extradition treaty, and involved a serious offense.
"We are very disappointed in the decision of the Swiss government."
The U.S. could also choose to internationally appeal the decision, though that is unlikely.
As for Polanski, whose electronic monitoring was also turned off as of this morning, his attorneys have been quick to praise the decision.
Polanski's France-based lawyer Georges Kiejman said, "I pay tribute to Swiss justice, its judicial analysis is very correct."
His lawyer Herve Temime offered up similar sentiments, saying, "It's an enormous satisfaction and a great relief after the pain suffered by Roman Polanski and his family."
Read more: http://ca.eonline.com/uberblog/b1898...#ixzz0tXSHaoaH
The life of this dude is ed up - can't say whether I feel bad for him or wish him he was sentenced.
First his pregnant wife gets killed by a maniac, then he rapes a 13 year old.
His lawyer Herve Temime offered up similar sentiments, saying, "It's an enormous satisfaction and a great relief after the pain suffered by Roman Polanski and his family."
Makes me want to throw up.
Very true, what happened to his wife was a tragedy but does not defend the raping of a young girl.
What a juridical failure. This guy should rot in jail, no matter who he is or what horrible things he has been thru, if he did it, he should pay. SMH
What an outrage. Makes you want to go out and loot a shoe store.
So the moral of the story is it's okay to rape 13 year olds in the USA if you did it in the 70's and have the support of a bunch of hollywood actors and directors.
moral of the story is as always. You have money, you get away with anything:
Roman
Michael Jackson
OJ
Kobe Bryant
etc, etc
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)
Posting Permissions
