Refreshing
I thought it would be Lakers-Heat or Heat-Lakers
Now if only NBC could be back in the picture..........
http://twitter.com/FisolaNYDN
Just like the old days.
Refreshing
I thought it would be Lakers-Heat or Heat-Lakers
Now if only NBC could be back in the picture..........
Boozer vs Amare. Just like a good night in the wild wild west.
the bulls and the kncks.. who the names a team after pants.... and there are and have never been bulls in chicago... WHAT's up with that.....
You and every other person in the world...
Or Lakers-Heat or Heat-Lakers
Thats pretty lame tbh but it doesn't really matter since I'll be way to ed up to care about whats on TV
pretty gay.
I would have liked to see Mavs vs Spurs
Bulls will be a very solid team next year, maybe 3rd seed...Knicks could surprise us all, we just have to wait and see.
Other than the "huge market" appeal, I don't see the point of these two meeting for a X'mas game.
It was great back then:
Big markets, opposing play-styles (Bulls are focused on defense, Knicks offense), and both teams grabbed a lot of new players including Amar'e and Boozer. Still should be entertaining but I agree a Lakers/Heat would've been better.
There's still (at least) another two slots here. They have two games on ABC and one on ESPN. This is probably the cable game. I can't imagine with the chance to put the two best teams in each Conference with Kobe Bryant and Lebron James going head-to-head (not to mention All-Stars Pau Gasol, Chris Bosh, Ron Artest, Dwyane Wade, Pat Riley, Phil Jackson) on the NBA's Showcase Day of the Year them not doing it. (Oops, I already fired Spolestra!). If they don't go head-to-head, the Lakers and Heat will be working on Christmas day.
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)