Pop wants Tony to be aggressive, try to penetrate. When Tony goes for 20+ pts, Spurs nearly always win. Tony is the difference-maker, not Tim. Tim will nearly always have good game, but without Tony also having a good game, the W is in doubt.
One of the things Tony hasn't completely mastered is when to shoot and when not to shoot. Tony knows, Pop tells him (is why Tony is now left in longer in 1st qtrs), that he has to get his game going early for the Spurs to succeed, on average.
I can't say Tony was slacking off last night. He drove a lot, which is great considering the beatings our drivers have been taking taking, but just wasn't finishing. Tim wasn't finishing around the basket, either. Tony also played good defense.
Tony has a ways to go, esp in playmaking. He's really between 2 roles, scorer and playmaker. He's not "done", yet. Getting the balance right isn't easy.
With Tim and Tony having sub-average games, Spurs were lucky to get the W last night. Spurs just didn't play very well (eg, only 15 ASTs for 39 FGs vs season avg of 22 AST for 36 FGs).
Manu, and Nazr, stepped up big to be the difference makers. That's the kind of TEAM effort it takes to win.
I'm not worried about Tony as long as he keeps hustling and being aggressive. I DON'T want him to give up his scoring role to be a Stockton-type playmaker only (Stockton scored quite well). Tony doesn't have, yet, a top playmaker's floor vision, although I do remember Tony averaging 10+ AST in the Dec 03 W-streak, where he averaged a very JKidd-style double-double in that streak. I'd love him to play like that now.

Reply With Quote