Page 1 of 11 12345 ... LastLast
Results 1 to 25 of 269
  1. #1
    i hunt fenced animals clambake's Avatar
    My Team
    Dallas Mavericks
    Join Date
    May 2006
    Post Count
    25,321
    General Motors Is Going Public
    By Chuck Squatriglia August 18, 2010 | 6:15 pm | Categories: Miscellaneous


    GM’s turnaround is almost complete.

    Today the General filed the first reams of paperwork needed to go public, a move that will free the automaker from government ownership and pay back the last of the billions it needed to stay afloat following its bankruptcy last year.

    GM’s 700-page S-1 Registration form filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission begins the process that will lead to the initial public offering of stock. Although no date has been given for the IPO, analysts tell Reuters it could come as early as October. There also is no word on how many shares might be offered. The company’s stakeholders — including the U.S. Treasury and possibly the United Auto Workers and the Canadian government — will sell common stock. GM also will offer Series B preferred stock.

    “The amount of securities offered will be determined by market conditions and other factors at the time of the offering,” the company said.

    It was not clear how much stock Uncle Sam might want to unload, and details on how much money might be raised will come as we get closer to the sale. But the Los Angeles Times cites Renaissance Capital when it says the IPO could be among the largest IPOs in American history, rivaling the deal by Visa Inc. that raised $17.9 billion in March, 2008.

    The U.S. Treasury poured some $50 billion into General Motors in 2008, a bailout that gave Uncle Sam 60.8 percent of GM’s stock. The bailout included a $6.7 billion loan through the Troubled Asset Relief Program. The Treasury Department said in a statement today that it would “retain the right, at all times, to decide whether and at what level to participate in the offering.”

    Things have gone well for GM this year. Beyond paying back the TARP loan in April, the company has earned $2.2 billion in the first six months of 2010. The IPO announcement came one week after GM posted a second-quarter profit of $1.6 billion, its largest in six years.

    “GM is rolling again – thanks the investment and patience of the American taxpayer,” U.S. Rep. John Dingell, D-Dearborn, told the Detroit Free Press. “I’m glad to see GM taking steps to pay that money back and putting Americans back to work.”

    GM plans to trade on the New York and Toronto stock exchanges under its common symbol GM.

    GM, founded on Sept. 16, 1908, was once among the most widely held stocks in the country. At its height, it had more than 1 million individual investors in the early 1960s. GM hit its highest market capitalization — $52 billion — in 2000, but its investors were almost completely wiped out when the company filed for bankruptcy in June, 2009. GM exited bankruptcy 40 days later.

    thank you, mr. president


    anyone else going in?

  2. #2
    Veteran DarrinS's Avatar
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    Jun 2005
    Post Count
    42,561
    Is it really an IPO if it used to be public?

  3. #3
    Cogito Ergo Sum LnGrrrR's Avatar
    My Team
    Boston Celtics
    Join Date
    Oct 2008
    Post Count
    22,399
    Pretty awesome. It's amazing the turnaround they've been able to make. Kudos to them, and for paying us back!

  4. #4
    Pimp Marcus Bryant's Avatar
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    Dec 1998
    Post Count
    1,021,992
    Yippidee ing doo dah.

  5. #5
    Cogito Ergo Sum LnGrrrR's Avatar
    My Team
    Boston Celtics
    Join Date
    Oct 2008
    Post Count
    22,399
    Yippidee ing doo dah.
    Come now Marcus, it's like raising a child. You have to encourage small steps.

  6. #6
    Mr. John Wayne CosmicCowboy's Avatar
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    Mar 2003
    Post Count
    44,142
    GM IPO stock is fools gold for the stupid.

    The US government has already ed GM stockholders and bondholders once.

    Big labor was the winner in the bailout.

    Stockholders and bondholders will get ed again next time too.

    Clambake, you need to bet your life savings on the new GM.

  7. #7
    Alleged Michigander ChumpDumper's Avatar
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    May 2003
    Post Count
    154,416
    So you wanted the stock and bond holders to be bailed out?

  8. #8
    Mr. John Wayne CosmicCowboy's Avatar
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    Mar 2003
    Post Count
    44,142
    So you wanted the stock and bond holders to be bailed out?
    You are smarter than that.

    I thought.

    Bond holders at a minimum should have at LEAST gotten a percentage on the dollar.

    That's how corporate bonds work. They are first tier in a bankruptcy/liquidation.

  9. #9
    Alleged Michigander ChumpDumper's Avatar
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    May 2003
    Post Count
    154,416
    You are smarter than that.

    I thought.

    Bond holders at a minimum should have at LEAST gotten a percentage on the dollar.

    That's how corporate bonds work. They are first tier in a bankruptcy/liquidation.
    So you wanted them at least partially bailed out?

  10. #10
    Mr. John Wayne CosmicCowboy's Avatar
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    Mar 2003
    Post Count
    44,142
    How do you think the system works?

    Bondholders are the people that loaned them the money to do business.

    They took their savings and LOANED them to GM with the promise that they would get a small return (probably 100 basic points over treasuries) in what normally was a safe investment.

    In a normal scenario, GM would have gone into bankruptcy and those bondholders would have had first claim on the assets as they were liquidated.

    That's not what happened. Those people who invested their savings in GM were wiped out and the UNIONS got GM.

    Pure political payback.

    Yeah, the bondholders should have gotten something.

    50 BILLION of savings stolen.

    50 BILLION of savings wiped out.

    If the US government can do that, why should anyone invest in US corporate bonds?

  11. #11
    Alleged Michigander ChumpDumper's Avatar
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    May 2003
    Post Count
    154,416
    How do you think the system works?

    Bondholders are the people that loaned them the money to do business.

    They took their savings and LOANED them to GM with the promise that they would get a small return (probably 100 basic points over treasuries) in what normally was a safe investment.

    In a normal scenario, GM would have gone into bankruptcy and those bondholders would have had first claim on the assets as they were liquidated.

    That's not what happened. Those people who invested their savings in GM were wiped out and the UNIONS got GM.

    Pure political payback.

    Yeah, the bondholders should have gotten something.

    50 BILLION of savings stolen.

    50 BILLION of savings wiped out.

    If the US government can do that, why should anyone invest in US corporate bonds?
    I wouldn't have invested in GM back then.

    Bad risk.

    Now?

    Maybe.

  12. #12
    Mr. John Wayne CosmicCowboy's Avatar
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    Mar 2003
    Post Count
    44,142
    I wouldn't have invested in GM back then.

    Bad risk.

    Now?

    Maybe.
    Back then when?

    Bonds are supposed to be safe long term investments. GM was "blue chip". There are people that invested in them way back before 2000 for their retirement that got wiped out. zero. so sorry. We just changed the rules. You aren't a secured investor anymore. We just took your life savings and gave it to the UAW. They will own GM from now on.

    It was a totally unprecedented ing of average investors that got no press at all.

    50 ing BILLION.

    Chump, I know you like to be difficult just to be adversarial but PLEASE tell me you don't think this was right...

  13. #13
    Cogito Ergo Sum LnGrrrR's Avatar
    My Team
    Boston Celtics
    Join Date
    Oct 2008
    Post Count
    22,399
    Gotta agree with CC here. Bondholders should have gotten something back, you would think. At the least, they should be recompensed the amount of stocks they had.

  14. #14
    Alleged Michigander ChumpDumper's Avatar
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    May 2003
    Post Count
    154,416
    I agree that it should have gone through a real bankruptcy, but I don't shed a tear for investors if they weren't smart enough to be diverse and recognize a company that was making tragically ty cars. If you believe in risk, accept it.

  15. #15
    i hunt fenced animals clambake's Avatar
    My Team
    Dallas Mavericks
    Join Date
    May 2006
    Post Count
    25,321
    cc hedging his bets by walking backward. lol

  16. #16
    W4A1 143 43CK? Nbadan's Avatar
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    Nov 2001
    Post Count
    32,408
    The company is making profit although I would feel better if Whitacre had stayed on as CEO

  17. #17
    W4A1 143 43CK? Nbadan's Avatar
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    Nov 2001
    Post Count
    32,408
    I agree that it should have gone through a real bankruptcy, but I don't shed a tear for investors if they weren't smart enough to be diverse and recognize a company that was making tragically ty cars. If you believe in risk, accept it.
    From what I've read that was unsecured bond debt...so CC does want an investor bail-out when they accepted the risk for a greater return...TFB...

  18. #18
    Veteran
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    Oct 2009
    Post Count
    2,539
    I agree that it should have gone through a real bankruptcy, but I don't shed a tear for investors if they weren't smart enough to be diverse and recognize a company that was making tragically ty cars. If you believe in risk, accept it.
    lmao, my tragically ty gm vehicle has 110k and has had 0 problems.

  19. #19
    I play pretty, no? TeyshaBlue's Avatar
    My Team
    Dallas Mavericks
    Join Date
    Jun 2006
    Post Count
    13,321
    I made a nice chunk buying GM pre-bailout @ $2.31/share and selling immediately thereafter @ $5.50.
    I'm interested to see what it opens at. I might be in for a little bit.
    Last edited by TeyshaBlue; 08-19-2010 at 10:11 AM.

  20. #20
    I play pretty, no? TeyshaBlue's Avatar
    My Team
    Dallas Mavericks
    Join Date
    Jun 2006
    Post Count
    13,321
    lmao, my tragically ty gm vehicle has 110k and has had 0 problems.
    lol...I've got an old 93 S-10 extended cab. It's my weekend, run-to-Home Depot-truck, except I drove it almost everyday for about 6 months when I had a brace of Fords crap out on me. 225,000 miles. I replaced the clutch at 150,000, put 1 alternator on it, and I'm about to put a starter on it...that's it.

    Ugly as , but you can't kill it.

  21. #21
    Scrumtrulescent
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    Nov 2006
    Post Count
    9,724
    GM might be a good stock play out of the gate while traders are all abuzz about the IPO, but I don't see this as a buy and hold one. After what happened to the bondholders GM is going to have a hard time borrowing money and will have to pay significantly higher interest rates. That will be a drag on their growth prospects.

  22. #22
    Veteran Ignignokt's Avatar
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    Aug 2007
    Post Count
    7,042
    I agree that it should have gone through a real bankruptcy, but I don't shed a tear for investors if they weren't smart enough to be diverse and recognize a company that was making tragically ty cars. If you believe in risk, accept it.
    Are you justifying the govt's actions??

    Is sanctioned theft which is what this really is, okay??

  23. #23
    Mr. John Wayne CosmicCowboy's Avatar
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    Mar 2003
    Post Count
    44,142
    I made a nice chunk buying GM pre-bailout @ $2.31/share and selling immediately thereafter @ $5.50.
    I'm interested to see what it opens at. I might be in for a little bit.
    ?????

    When they did the pre-packaged deal the original shareholders were wiped out. You must have sold on one of the rumors and not the official bailout.

  24. #24
    The D.R.A. Drachen's Avatar
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    Nov 2004
    Post Count
    11,214
    ?????

    When they did the pre-packaged deal the original shareholders were wiped out. You must have sold on one of the rumors and not the official bailout.
    I don't know if this is what TB was talking about, but the shareholders were not immediately wiped out. Their shares were put in a holding company trading under GMQ (if I remember correctly). It was still trading at a high volume because some people (mistakenly) thought that the shareholders would be given shares in the new GM IPO. The SEC feared that this could cause an uproar when people "found out" (the info was already out there) that they would not make it through bankrupcy. They even changed the trading symbol to MTLQQ (Q denotes bankrupcy, they added a second Q in order to be more forceful). This is when the stock truely dropped and traded in the 0.50 range. It was full of pumpers and dumpers, but it even climbed back to around 1.50 when good news about GM would come out (all numbers are from memory so don't crucify me if I am a little off). Not saying that TB DID DO this, however this is how it COULD have happened.

  25. #25
    Alleged Michigander ChumpDumper's Avatar
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    May 2003
    Post Count
    154,416
    Are you justifying the govt's actions??
    I said it should have gone through a real bankruptcy. Apparently you can't read.

    Is sanctioned theft which is what this really is, okay??
    It is one of many possible outcomes when one risks his or her money. If you don't believe in risk and want everyone to be bailed out in every situation, fine.

Thread Information

Users Browsing this Thread

There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •