Dallas concerns me much more than Phoenix. The Suns rely too heavily on Nash to set up their other guys. The Mavs offer similiar types of matchup problems for the Spurs that Seattle posed once Lewis and Radmanovic went down last series. Dallas can throw a team out on the court with 4 or 5 guys who all can take their man off the dribble. Dirk has always been a tough cover for the Spurs. Dallas can force the Spurs to take their second big off the court a lot more than Phoenix can, which weakens the Spurs' D significantly.
The Suns do have homecourt and perhaps this Spurs team needs homecourt much more than the prior two championship teams, but they don't concern me like the Mavs do. The Spurs' achilles heel remains, after all of these years (see '91 playoffs), facing good jumpshooting teams who can create and shoot over the top of the defense.
The more things change the more they stay the same.
I disagree, Dallas's point guard play is so horrible, Tony Parker and Udrih would get at least 10 points a piece, Horry can defend Nowitzki decently, and I think Duncan would get well on the Mavericks much more than the Sonics..
Either team will be tough, but, IMO, Duncan should have huge series against either one, and itll be two tough jumpshooting teams.
Lets hope we play whoever has the weakest bench, because ours is looking like a MASH unit. I think Phoenix has less depth and more dropoff on the bench vs. the starting 5, what do you think?
"Phoenix has less depth and more dropoff on the bench "
The weak PHX bench has been said to be PHX's ultimate, will-hurt-them-in-the-playoffs weakness all year long, but Jim Jackson is filling in great for JJ (his 4th qtr won Game5), and the Sonics starters still avg 400 MPG with no apparent ill effects, well into the playoffs.
The Spurs bench, supposedly "deep" but in playoff terms is just Robert and Beno and Brent, ain't been doing in the playoffs, except for Robert, meaning the Spurs are effectively shallow, also.
the perimeter defense of both teams suck...
i won't be surprise if we parker and manu average 25 points a game each
I think both Beno and Horry had solid to good series vs the Sonics.ain't been doing in the playoffs
Beno had some big baskets last night, so I have to disagree.
I agree, I have less concerns w/Phoenix than w/Dallas.
I would much rather play the Suns than the Mavericks. The matchup's that the Mavericks present are not something I relish seeing.
That, and I can't wait to see Mouse crying.
I also want Phoenix. Dallas causes us more matchup problems and their players have more playoff experience with Finley and Nowitzki. The Suns seem to cave if you rattle them and we've played them well this year even when shorthanded.
No matter who the Spurs get, I want the Phx-Dal series to go to a game seven. The guys, especially Duncan and Ginobili need the rest.
Did the Sonics really have an O run by a point or one with multiple penetrators and some chumps up front?
Dallas can go with Dirk and 4 guards for stretches of games. Spurs' D is going to suffer with TD having to chase Dirk around.
Phoenix is a much more conventional team for the Spurs to face.
that is why you have Horry chase him around.Spurs' D is going to suffer with TD having to chase Dirk around.
Horry can keep up Nowitzki.
I dont know about that.Phoenix is a much more conventional team for the Spurs to face.
They seem like with their pick and rolls would be very tough for the Spurs.
Either one though, IMO, defensively, is worse than Seattle.
Maybe, but think of the Mavs' D with Dirk guarding Duncan...Spurs' D is going to suffer with TD having to chase Dirk around.
Advantage Spurs.
Agreed. For Phx to be successful, they basically have four guys on the court who need for Nash to get them the ball in the right cir stance. Good D on Nash and forcing Nash to play some D himself is something Tony Parker can do, and this effects not just Nash, but the rest of the Suns on the floor if Nash can't set them up as easily.
With Dallas, take away one player with good defense and you have another guy that can heat up and beat you any given night. Terry, Dirk, Finley, Howard, Daniels, etc. Plus Avery probably knows Pop's system better than any other opposing coach.
Give me Phoenix. But Dallas needs to win the next one.
can you say, foul trouble???but think of the Mavs' D with Dirk guarding Duncan...
also, in 03 you had to worry about, Lafrentz, Najera, getting thrown at DUncan,
now, its only Nowitzki and dumb Dampier.
I doubt thought that Dallas wins, I think itll be Phoenix.
I think we're in good shape for either team. Neither team is anything close to as physical as Seattle was on the defensive end, and both play a fast-paced offensive game similar to the Sonics.
I think the next series will require less of an adjustment on the Spurs' part than their opponent. The Suns and Mavs have faced basically no resistance on their offensive plays, and it may take some time to adjust to having to hit shots/layups over a defender.
what is to know?!?!? lol.Plus Avery probably knows Pop's system
pick and rolls, 4 down, iso for Parker and Ginobili.
The offense aint complicated lol.
yes....tonights game and game 7 need to go into 3OT!No matter who the Spurs get, I want the Phx-Dal series to go to a game seven. The guys, especially Duncan and Ginobili need the rest.
I agree, Denver and Seattle were perfect warmups for Dallas, Phoenix.I think the next series will require less of an adjustment on the Spurs' part than their opponent
I hope the Spurs starting tommarow start working on pick and roll D for Dirk or Stoudamire.
I don't envision anyone on the Suns dropping flagrant fouls on the Spurs because they are getting their asses kicked. The Mavs and their fans have less class than any of the teams the Spurs have played so far this post season. After all the dirty play, I'd be happy to see the Spurs play a basketball team instead of a hockey team for a change.
Why is it that some still say that Seattle's plays a fast-paced offense? They were one of the slowest paced teams in the league this season. Even slower than the Spurs. A lot of their offense is in the halfcourt with their screen and rolls, and when AD is in the game it seems they become even more halfcourt oriented.
Seattle is similiar to the Suns simply due to the fact that they have a very potent and efficient offense. Other than that? They are actually very different teams.
Which ever team wins the spurs will slow the game down and make it half court game as both teams like to run. The question is...who do you want shooting from the perimeter?? Nowitzki, Finley and Stackhouse or Nash, and Marion with Stoudamire crahsing the boards?? Me? I'll take the Suns!!
Mavs can take the tact of letting TD get his and force the other Spurs to create their own opportunities, in favor of getting the mismatches they want on the offensive end.
The Spurs aren't exactly immune from struggling when facing such a strategy as demonstrated in the last series. There is no reason why that series should have gone 6 games.
, Seattle pushed the Spurs to 6 games with Allen, AD, Ridnour, and a gaggle of chumps.
The Mavs have a number of players with better offensive skills than AD and Ridnour. Not exactly an interesting prospect to face in the halfcourt or the full.
You're right, Nikos, and I chose a poor term to describe the similarities I see with the Sonics and our next opponents. While the Sonics run the break far less than the Suns, I still see similarities in the half court game. One of those similarities - a heavy reliance on 3-point shooting - was not much of a factor in this series due to Lewis and Radmanovic's injuries, but much of their motion offense in the half court looks very much like what we could expect from the Suns in the half court, albeit against a much better finisher in the paint.
We saw from the Denver series that the Spurs are able to keep a running team from breaking at will, and if we can do the same with the Suns, I think we'll be prepared for whatever else they try to throw at us.
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)
Posting Permissions
Reply With Quote
