Reply With Quote
So we could play BYU.
http://www.sltrib.com/sltrib/utes/50...-game.html.csp
pussies!
Why you cancel series with BSU?
So we could play BYU.
http://www.sltrib.com/sltrib/utes/50...-game.html.csp
they didn't have to cancel 2011
and according to FBschedules they only have 11 scheduled for 2012 and 2013 as well, what am I missing.
oh well, BSU getting $350k for nothinghopefully they replace Utah with a legit BCS team
like NEBRASKA!!!
Scared
also the 9 game conference schedule for the pac-12 is stupid, why not just play the teams in the other division every other year, instead of rotating 2 teams that you don't play. why lessen the amount of great cross-conference match-ups?
also, are the divisions set? are they really going to break up the cali teams?
how could they not just put cali/arizona in the south and everyone else in the north? how could they get that wrong?
Last edited by vander; 10-07-2010 at 08:49 PM.
Utah gets $250k from Iowa State so it's basically a wash money wise.they didn't have to cancel 2011
and according to FBschedules they only have 11 scheduled for 2012 and 2013 as well, what am I missing.
oh well, BSU getting $350k for nothing
like NEBRASKA!!!
Utah is playing a 9 game conference schedule. They need room for BYU and possibly Utah State. They also said they will schedule Montana State. That's 12 games. No room for Boise St.
I'm pretty bummed about it as well cause I thought this could've been an epic 3 game series. Both teams will have their key players for 2 of the 3 games, but to be honest I'd rather play Utah State and BYU. Definitely want to still see our rivals on the schedule.
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)
Posting Permissions
