Reply With Quote
i would give Duncan an A he more than made up with some of the turnovers he caused
Quick Grades: Spurs at Suns @ the San Antonio Dispatch
Tim Duncan B+ Other than turnovers, Duncan was dominant on both ends.
Manu Ginobili B Very good in first half, mini meltdown in second half.
Tony Parker C+ Started well but effectiveness waned as game progressed.
Richard Jefferson A+ Three-point barrage in fourth basically won the game.
DeJuan Blair C Played a little better but still a long ways to go.
Antonio McDyess B+ Very solid in all aspects. A bit too hesitant at times.
James Anderson A- Illustrated a high basketball IQ. His passing was key.
Tiago Splitter A- Drew three offensive fouls. Great D and post moves.
Garrett Temple C- Struggled on defense. Not too helpful on offense, either.
Gary Neal C+ Defensively overmatched by size. Good aggression on other end.
Last edited by timvp; 11-04-2010 at 12:33 AM.
i would give Duncan an A he more than made up with some of the turnovers he caused
Site doesn't load for me o_O
yeah, not working at the moment.
no workee
You guys hammered the site
Im having a lot of trouble accessing the site, maybe the traffics too high?
links are broke.
Same here
Not loading
We use to get this stuff delivered to our door now we have to go get the at the end of the driveway.
I think you're rather harsh on the Big 3 for this game. They shouldered the entire offensive load for the first half.
I usually agree with your grades but not quite this time.
Updated first post. Trying to go too fast apparently killed the other server
Parker deserves at least a B- due to his non-stop energy and effort when he was guarding Nash.
I swear Parker thought it was the playoffs out there when defending Nash.
Very proud of him, in fact, his effort on D might have something to do with lack of energy on Offense. Maybe?
Id prob give duncan an A and I thought Neal played better than a C+ even though he really didn't do much. The guy brings tons of energy and i thought he did a good job staying in front of his guys on defense.
Not to sound like a kiss ass but I agree with all those scores.
nash shot terrible
tp sucked on his o second half sat some due to foul trouble
but nash shot terrible
Lol @ the site crashing..
I didn't get to see the game, but got a few texts about how RJ was amazing
I've agreed more with some of his other game grades. Some of his others have been spot on IMO but this one is debatable.
I don't care how much you turned the ball over, you go 25 and 17 (and 3 blocks) shooting 11-13 from the field and 3-3 from the line especially in an ultimately winning effort, that has A effort written all over it.
Turnovers are bad, but you seem to weigh them more heavily than offensive efficiency.
Parker was straight up playoff effort out there on defense.
Nash did not know what hit him the first time he was defended in both the 1st and 2nd half.
That stun-effect seemed to carry-over and Nash never found a true offensive Nash Style rhythm.
Was James Anderson on the floor in crunch time?
If so that is an amazing development considering Pop's prior philosophy.
Id give Pop an A+ in coaching tonight also. I thought everything he did was pretty much perfect. No small ball tonight minus certain situations under 1 minute was a beautiful site.
It's funny because I know his grades are totally an opinion but I found these to be what I agree with and his others a bit off.
Temple for Neal?????
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)
Posting Permissions
