Reply With Quote
They have intelligent readers. Somewhere between 76.9% and 82.7% of them, anyway.
Scientific American has done everything within their power to "educate" their readers about manmade weather fluctuation. http://www.scientificamerican.com/ar...climate-change
I understand that they are upset and confused about these results from a recent reader poll:
They have intelligent readers. Somewhere between 76.9% and 82.7% of them, anyway.
Honestly, no bull , those people talking global warming as if our planet is going to die in the near future (Like within a billion years or less) if we donot change our "ways" are some dumb mother ers.
Some people believe that floride is a government plot, the moon landings were faked, magic crystals can heal you, and 9-11 was an inside job.
The only difference is that none of those conspiracy theories has the same bankroll that global warming deniers have from fossil fuel lobbying firms.
Not that they are wrong simply because they are bankrolled, it is just their propaganda is all the more effective at swaying a deeply scientifically illiterate portion of the population.
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)
Posting Permissions