Bill Frist is a giant vagina

[IcemanCometh]

This morning on the floor of the Senate, Sen. Chuck Schumer asked Majority Leader Bill Frist a simple question:


SEN. SCHUMER: Isn’t it correct that on March 8, 2000, my colleague [Sen. Frist] voted to uphold the filibuster of Judge Richard Paez?

SEN. FRIST: The president, the um, in response, uh, the Paez nomination - we’ll come back and discuss this further. … Actually I’d like to, and it really brings to what I believe - a point - and it really brings to, oddly, a point, what is the issue. The issue is we have leadership-led partisan filibusters that have, um, obstructed, not one nominee, but two, three, four, five, six, seven, eight, nine, ten, in a routine way

So, Frist is arguing that one filibuster is OK. His problem is that several Bush nominees have been filibustered. This position completely undercuts Frist’s argument that judicial filibusters are uncons utional. (Which is, in turn, the justification for the nuclear option.) If judicial filibusters are uncons utional there is no freebee. But Frist digs his hole even deeper:

SEN. FRIST: The issue is not cloture votes per se, it’s the partisan, leadership-led use of cloture votes to kill - to defeat - to assassinate these nominees. That’s the difference. Cloture has been used in the past on this floor to postpone, to get more info, to ask further questions.

When Frist voted to filibuster Paez’s nomination it had been pending for four years. It’s hard to believe he couldn’t get all the info he needed or ask all the questions he had during that time. Make no mistake about it: Bill Frist was trying to kill the Paez nomination. A press release issued the following day by former Sen. Bob Smith, who organized the filibuster effort. All the details about Frist’s hypocrisy here.

[Nbadan]

Cloture is the fillibustering technique perferred by the Majority party. If you can't get the measure to the floor, you very well can't have a up or down vote now can ya?

Luckly, the Paez cloture filibuster failed and his nomination eventually went through.

[FromWayDowntown]

Well, and the Republicans seem to just omit their refusal to allow either Jorge Rangel or Enrique Moreno to even get before the Judiciary Committee, after the Republican Senators from Texas refused to submit blue sheets on either nominee.

The hypocrisy is amazing.

Somehow, a filibuster at the Senate level, where activities are transparent, is uncons utional, but obtructionism at the Committee level, where the truth is somewhat harder to see, is a perfectly permissible political strategy to combat the nominees of the opposing party.

[SPARKY]

One party wants to do away with X tradition and the other party suddenly develops a profound respect for that tradition.

I haven't seen too many bring up good old Strom Dog's filibuster of the Civil Rights Act of 1957.