Reply With Quote
why bother...you have comprehension skills of a 2nd grader...however, I will do this for the benefit of the board in general because it's so much fun step by step here we go:
The case of the Spurs player Neal is far darker and more complex, especially to those who thought the Spurs would never sign someone with his collection of court do ents. The various accounts of June 23, 2004, do not fit with the Robinson-Duncan profile.
According to police records and the victim’s testimony, she asked Neal for some pretzels, and they went into the kitchen.
“I was going to throw up,” she testified in court, according to the Philadelphia Daily News. “So the closest thing to me was the sink. So, I leaned over the sink and started throwing up, like, profusely.
In the meantime, as this is transpiring, Gary came behind me and started undoing my pants while I’m throwing up. I’m barely, like, standing.”
She testified Neal and another La Salle player raped her. She vomited again before passing out, she told the courtroom.Neal lied and told a La Salle coach afterward that he had only oral sex with the woman, while Cleaves said nothing happened, a prosecutor said.
Police later found Cleaves' semen in a condom they recovered from the sink, as well as DNA that matched Neal, he said.
"They treated her less than human," Assistant District Attorney Rich DeSipio told jurors in his opening statement.The Spurs then sat down with Neal three different times, including the mandatory one-on-one with Popovich. The Spurs liked what they heard, and their research supported their impressions so they signed the SOB.
