Reply With Quote
Chaiman of what?
The house committee on flower appreciation?
ALERT: John Boehner discussing ways to PREVENT Ron Paul from becoming Chairman! (IMPORTANT)
"Five GOP leadership aides, speaking anonymously because a decision isn't final, say incoming House Speaker John Boehner has discussed ways to prevent Paul from becoming chairman or to keep him on a tight leash if he does."
Contact John Boehner: (513)-779-5400 or (202)225-4000
Contact Eric Cantor: (202) 225-2815 or (804) 747-4073
Tell them we will not stand for any attempts to block Ron Paul's chairmanship!
http://www.ronpaulforums.com/showthread.php?t=271156
Chaiman of what?
The house committee on flower appreciation?
Chairman of the House Subcommittee for Domestic Monetary Policy and Technology.
http://www.thenewamerican.com/index....irman-ron-paul
Boehner is a with ears. I cnt stand that prick.
http://www.businessweek.com/magazine...7035613107.htm
Not a snowball's chance in .The bottom line: After waiting decades, Fed critic Ron Paul is in line to chair the House's monetary policy subcommittee.
I would be highly surprised if the pro-business leadership would let anybody who might with the banking system anywhere near the chairmanship.
tea party will go APE if Boehner makes a misstep here.
audit the fed! down with boner!
call, please.
what do you recommend I tell him? I am not republican, and I am not a cons uent. Suggestions?
tell them you called or spoke with your own congressperson, and that his decisions affect everyone in the nation.
does " with the banking system" include auditing the fed?
RG you sound like the king of sheep.
bla bla bla.
or should it be
baa baa baa?
I wouldn't want Mr. Paul anywhere near that chairmanship either, but it would overall be a good thing for Democrats, so by all means, let him get it.
good for democrats > good for america
So? They've already tricked you into allying with them to get your vote. It's not Boehner's fault there are a LOT of dumb Tea Partiers.
Mission Accomplished.
Is low reading comprehension your schtick or did you ignore the first half of my sentence entirely?I wouldn't want Mr. Paul anywhere near that chairmanship either, but it would overall be a good thing for Democrats, so by all means, let him get it.
For the good of the country as I see it, I would not want Mr. Paul to be chairman of that committee. This places the good of the country ahead of that of the Democratic party.
But, if the GOP allows it, I would not be all that sad at the trainwreck that would entail for the GOP.
Paul is too radical for him to be given real power, even if I agree with a couple of his ideas.
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)
Posting Permissions
