Reply With Quote
Fail
srsly, look at you guys obsessing ovr the Mavs. do something productive with your lives, imho. tbh, imho, America eating my lunch, herapedPeriod,
s or GTFO
Mammories or please depart
Breasts or exit
Fail
srsly, look at you guys obsessing ovr the Mavs. do something productive with your lives, imho. tbh, imho, America eating my lunch, herapedPeriod,
s or GTFO
Mammories or please depart
Breasts or exit
tbh imo fwiw, I think these people are wannabe mav fans. our team consists of allstars and a young core. there is no limit with this team
we sssssstttttttaaacccckkkkkdkedddddddddddddddeeddd
Be more specific in what you're bashing at bag, cus I haven't posted too much the last few days and it seems out of nowhere you decided to attack me on the visitors message..just out of nowhere you thought of me and decided why not?
Nice, bag. Does trolling bring you a lot of joy?
Oh yeah, you're wrong about pretty much everything you said, as it's not my first semester and I don't believe I have the whole world figured out. At least I like to think though.
And by saying you remember when you were "young and ing re ed"...that statement, if true, means the difference between me and you is time. So, it would be the equivalent of making fun of a baby for not knowing how to add/subtract, even though such a thing would be completely irrational.
Fortunately it's irrelevant because I'm probably smarter than you were/are now.
Be more specific in what you're bashing at bag, cus I haven't posted too much the last few days and it seems out of nowhere you decided to attack me on the visitors message..just out of nowhere you thought of me and decided why not?
Nice, bag. Does trolling bring you a lot of joy?
Oh yeah, you're wrong about pretty much everything you said, as it's not my first semester and I don't believe I have the whole world figured out. At least I like to think though.
And by saying you remember when you were "young and ing re ed"...that statement, if true, means the difference between me and you is time. So, it would be the equivalent of making fun of a baby for not knowing how to add/subtract, even though such a thing would be completely irrational.
Fortunately it's irrelevant because I'm probably smarter than you were/are now.
sh2, the goods, par the norm
miss you buddy
I'm so old and outdated with my ytmnd crap
http://myspacide.ytmnd.com/
Like you. I to believe we need a play-off system, but I do have some questions. There are 35 bowls, how many bowls are going to participate in your play-off system? What will happen to the bowls not included in your system? What happens to the charities / civic groups / cities that benefit from the bowl games?
Sorry, the DII system is not applicable, nor is your one month play-off using the bowl sites. One of the advantages of the DI system is that 70 schools "earn" a second spring training by going to a bowl. In a play-off setting, this extra practice period is acutely constrained. Secondly, having bowl games every week does not allow the city to properly prepare for the teams. Teams, and their fans, now come in for a week; in a bowl play-off system, teams would come in on Friday morning and leave Saturday evening.
Having stated on the negatives, I would be remiss if I did not offer possible solutions for your consideration. My suggestions for a play-off system are included below:
Presently, The BCS gives an automatic bid to the champions of six conferences (ACC, Big East, Big 10, Big 12, PAC 10, and SEC) and limits conference participation to a maximum of two schools from each conference. Additionally, there are rules governing participation by non-BCS schools, and independents. There also exists a working relationship between some bowls and conferences (think Rose Bowl).
The current BCS structure includes four Bowls: Fiesta, Orange, Rose, and Sugar; as well as a National Championship Game. Teams playing in the four bowls are determined by conference championships and at-large bids issued by the participating bowl committees. Participants in the National Championship Game are determined by the BCS rankings at the conclusion of the regular football season.
The following rules would govern the proposed format:
Working relationships between bowls and conferences would have to be modified to accommodate format changes.
The top eight teams, as determined by the BCS standings at the conclusion of the regular season, would qualify for the National Championship tournament.
The limit on maximum number of conference participants involved in the BCS format would be increased to four.
The automatic BCS bid to the champions of six conferences (ACC, Big East, Big 10, Big 12, PAC 10, and SEC) as well as independents and non-BCS teams would be honored. However, these teams would participate in the National Championship ONLY if ranked in the top eight teams as determined by the BCS standings at the conclusion of the regular season.
Teams will be announced for bowl participation on the Sunday immediately following the conference championships. All eight teams participating in round one of the play-offs are guaranteed a second game during New Year’s Day weekend.
The first round of the play-offs would take place on the weekend immediately following the conclusion of the regular season. Teams ranked 1 through 4 would host teams ranked 5 through 8 according to the following pairings:
8 @ 1
7 @ 2
6 @ 3
5 @ 4
The second round of the play-offs would take place in a BCS bowl during New Year’s Day weekend.
In order to honor all possible commitments to qualifying schools, two additional bowls would be added to the BCS format.
BCS Bowls would alternate hosting the play-off semifinals in accordance with the following schedule:
2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020 2021
ROSE X Y X Y
SUGAR Y X Y X
ALAMO X Y X Y
ORANGE Y X Y X
FIESTA X Y X Y
COTTON Y X Y X
X = highest rated team remaining VS lowest rated team remaining
Y = second highest rated team remaining VS third highest rated team remaining
The championship round of the play-offs would take place two weeks after New Year’s Day weekend at a site determined by the appropriate committees.
BUMP you need to start a thread where people have to match posts to poster...an ST civil service exam, tbh.
DUH DUH DUH DERRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRR
the schmitty wants an explanation of how he's being schmittied!
Would you the catlady?
4>0
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)
Posting Permissions
