Because it wasn't really voidable and will surely be a point of argument in the upcoming CBA arbitration.
Now they trade him for an useless Lewis just because he has 1y/20mio less than Arenas left.
So why they not even tried to void him?
29 of 30 teams prefer a empty bag of chips over Lewis...
Last edited by sefant77; 12-19-2010 at 05:55 PM.
Because it wasn't really voidable and will surely be a point of argument in the upcoming CBA arbitration.
trying to void and failing would make his contract worthless. its risky, and it didnt look like anyone would want to trade for arenas at that value- but Lewis has the worst contract in the league, so they found a trade partner. one liability for another, it will be fun to see how it works out.
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)