I don't agree with certain claims the OP has made.
1)The Lakers game was a true test in my opinion, their full roster was available. It is not the Spurs fault that Kobe decided to try and shoot the Lakers back into the game himself. I know some Lakers fans will say that Bynum was less than 100%, but he played better than most of the Lakers who were 100%.
2) Most Spurs fans had the Orlando game as an L before the game even started simply because of the back-to-back off of a very early morning arrival. IIRC, in the 4 games w/o Hill, we gave up around 110 PPG. I think that very obviously shows how valuable GH3 is to the Spurs' defense.
3) @Mike: The Mavs have lost their first 2 games without Dirk. I guess the depth of these supposedly "tougher" Mavs has been exaggerated a bit if they can't even beat a laughably bad Raptors team that was without its leading scorer as well.
4) The Boston game will be a tough one with or without Rondo and KG because the Celtics have shown this season that other guys are capable of stepping up and leading them to victory. Plus, it will be the end of a back-to-back after facing the running Knicks.
5) True, Denver was without Carmelo for the game in SA, but what also gets overlooked is that they got Billups, Martin, and Andersen back that same game. For the Spurs-Nuggets game in Denver, Carmelo was available but the other three were not.
6) Seriously my fellow Spurs fans, quit with the "I want a true test" crap. We are 28-4 for crying out loud, and I'm pretty sure none of us saw this coming prior to the start of the season. So let's just enjoy the W's under whatever cir stances they may come!
GO SPURS GO!