Reply With Quote
Those aren't hollow points?
The safety is not engaged?
What's wrong with this picture?
Those aren't hollow points?
The safety is not engaged?
No hollow points?
ok, I have some questions:
1. can you take down a running buck at 80 yrds with that thing?
2. where's the fancy pearl handle?
Don't need a pearl handle, sweetie. The gun I have will kill ya' either way.
Am I the only one that read that as "running back"?
No. I didn't even catch it until your post.
The bottle of Jim Beam and the pack of cigarettes are missing from the above photo.
pearl handles feel less sweaty.
Only a Pimp in a cheap New Orleans house carries a gun with pearl handles...These are ivory handles...General George Patton...
Uh...the clip?
The dead person next to the gun??????
I wonder if anyone got the answer right or is AHF asleep?
If not, is it because it's an auto and not a revolver?
The gun and the bullets are not real? I mean, they are a picture of a picture.
its not a glock 17
The man-purse under the gun instread of a holster.
not an American made gun.
It is not pointed at someone?
What's wrong with this picture?
I know bad taste....but hey.
Rounds loaded in clip backwards!
So is this like one of those retorical questions?
This is the right answer, correct?
Yes, has to be!
Although, I don't really understand how is this possible.
That is a distinct possibility, although you wouldn't expect a company to let a mistake like that go on a publication they put out...
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)
Posting Permissions
