Dynasty question..

[Dexter..]

I was arguing with this dumbass Magic fan (She's only started liking them this year and thought playing Dwight for 48 minutes puts him on his GOAT status.) who says the Spurs aren't a dynasty since they've never repeated but yet her team has won nothing but heartbreak.
My question is do you consider the Spurs a dynasty or no?

[sammy]

Spurs are a Dynasty! Amazing accomplishment for a small market team!

[Obstructed_View]

I don't feed trolls, even in real life. You should learn from my example.

[DMC]

[Splits]

Oh, wait....

[Nathan89]

Whatever they are, I likes.

[Juggity]

What a in' dumbass.

First off:
SPURS =x4 > x0 = MAGIC

Second:
If more than one championship is won by the same core team, it's a dynasty. Nobody who knows anything about basketball— or even sports in general— would deny that.

[TDMVPDPOY]

tell her, lol d12 leaving in FA hahahaha

[Tinystarz]

no back to back so no sorry spurs are no dynasty

[John Basedow]

tell her, lol d12 leaving in FA hahahaha

christ almighty you're such a ing tool

[TE]

Terrible troll.

[BadOne]

I've always felt that the Spurs weren't a true dynasty because of the fact that they've been unable to defend their les. I don't know about any of the other players, but I've heard even Tony Parker say this after the 2007 campaign. That, of course, doesn't take away from the greatness they as a team and an organization have achieved, placing them among the greatest professional teams of all time.

[dunkman]

No question about . . .