Reply With Quote
the only way I see RJ trades is something like Manu + Parker + RJ for Arenas + Hedo + Nelson
Would it have to be a 3 way trade? I think he could still be good given the right pg. You package him with Tony and the team that gets both ends up with the same pos. However, put him with a Nash or Paul type pg and he could be decent again.
the only way I see RJ trades is something like Manu + Parker + RJ for Arenas + Hedo + Nelson
Lol what? And make SA another Miami? The nba won't allow us to have a powerhouse team like that.
my point is only way to get rid of RJ is to include Manu and get even worse contracts back.
Hiv?
Aids?
Brake his legs?
a 14 incher with unlimited batteries
Oh because this is about D Howard?
Diabeetus?
deez nutz?
All-expenses-paid vacation in Mexico? Throw in a gold pendant necklace and a wad of $100 bills he can flash.
let rj spend the night with your dumb morons lmao lol jk
A gay coach...
Put RJ on a team where he doesn't have to play team defense, isn't required to think in crucial situations and isn't relied upon in the latter parts of the season and he's golden for 30 million. Raptors, without a doubt. No defense, none of them think in crucial situations because they are often being blown out, and they don't get to the post season so RJ cannot choke there.
http://games.espn.go.com/nba/tradeMa...radeId=63mnyhp
I would talk to Cleveland and do a RJ/Dice for B. Davis deal (even throw in a pick or rights to De Colo or something if you had to)
Ultimately the money difference isn't that great (RJ 30 over 3 / Davis at 28 over 2) and while Davis doesn't seem to have some of the at ude problems he use to i would still fill more comfortable with RJ around young guys in terms of setting a example and professionalism. Plus Davis averaged only 24 mins a game last year and now with Irving and obvious youth movement that time would only go down.
Spurs get veteran PG to play behind TP who is no more overpaid than RJ and should be thankful to be given the chance at winning in his final years
Last edited by JonNOKC; 06-24-2011 at 08:53 PM.
make him sleep with the fishes.
The last time we made a deal to get rid of a bad contract, it cost us Scola. I like your way better.
Most of y'all are clowns. Just because RJ, along with the 11 other Spurs, had a bad series doesn't mean he can't play anywhere. The guy averaged 12 points on 40+% shooting from 3 all damn year 80+ ing games.
Teams like the Cavs, Bobcats and Clippers could use still a player like him. Spurs just have to add quality assets like Blair and a pick to the package to lighten the pile of crap they get back in return, mainly due to his salary.
Last edited by EricD; 06-24-2011 at 09:50 PM.
Wow a Spurfan with sense. Would you look at that!
As far as i know the Cavs don't have a SF on the roster?
And they have JJ Hickson and Antawn Jamison at PF, both are similar in production but with a massive contract difference (jamison 13 million, hickson 1.5 million)
I wander if the Cavs would unload Antawn Jamison in exchange for Richard Jefferson and Antonio's expiring contract.
http://games.espn.go.com/nba/tradeMa...radeId=5vo8fjr
They dangled Tony on draft day, and no team would take him because the price was taking RJ also. Somehow, I don't think Blair and picks gets it done.
Or maybe Spurs turned them down and laughed and asked for more, which other teams weren't willing to do?They dangled Tony on draft day, and no team would take him because the price was taking RJ also. Somehow, I don't think Blair and picks gets it done.
At the same time, it's very hard and idiotic to take on 22 million, RJ/TP, in salary with the unknown of the new CBA.
RJ + Blair would only be 40% of that which makes it more tolerable.
Get a clue.
Spurs will find a suitor for RJ with Blair being the sweetner. Mark my words.
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)
Posting Permissions
