Reply With Quote
The owners dont need to do . It's the players that will be panicking way before the owners will. Those guys are billionaires they dont give a about these losses lmao.
if you have the comprehension of a gnat this thread isn't for you...
I say class warfare amongst owners is necessary...The most profitable teams need to stand up to the least profitable and have a knock down drag out to force the bad owners into a compromise. Instead of the players breaking rank we need the owners to be at each others throats...
Dr. Buss needs to step up and lead the way in creating discord amongst the owners since he's the only one with balls anyway... He's already helping these ing moron owners by paying luxury taxes dollar for dollar which is in turn shared ( fought after) amongst the least profitable teams. They're likes crabs in a barrel so to speak.
The teams owners that are making a good profit right now should team up:
Lakers, Boston, Bulls, Knicks, Rockets, Suns, Raptors, Thunder, Cavs, Blazers, Pistons, Warriors, and the Clippers all turned a profit last year. They should start a fight with the other owners who are in the red when it comes to revenues at least for last year.
The Cavs dropped in % value by 26 million but still turned a profit. ( Maybe it was fans showing support in spite of Lebron) The Heat gained in 1 yr value by 17 million but still didn't turn a profit last year.and being the ty teams they are the Clippers and Pistons actually have a zero debt / value %...meaning that whatever market value the teams have, they're indebted a certain % of that value.
I say lets start a fight amongst the owners...
Ohh and what's really funny is that the *world champ Mavs made $146(m) in revenues this past season and and they're still in the red or negative by 7.8(m)....Can one of you smart Mav fans explain that ...
Now what's cool is that the Pacers made a paltry 95(m) in revenue and was in the red by 16.9(m) and yet they still didn't lay off anyone in their staff. That's a company worth giving your all to.
I figure most of you may not be smart enough to decipher the forbes data so I did my own summary for you...
http://www.forbes.com/lists/2011/32/...s-11_land.html
The owners dont need to do . It's the players that will be panicking way before the owners will. Those guys are billionaires they dont give a about these losses lmao.
those with the most have the most to lose. Your thinking is flawed because it's limited...the owners risk business viability down the road....I think most level headed people will recognize the owners as the pigs they are...just like most people understand the Republicans are treasonous bas s...
Default and Obama still wins...bring on the mass suicides...but I digress...
Tell us all how much the owners get paid if there is no season.
Then tell us all what the players get paid if there is no season.
Thanks in advance.
the owners get nothing per se...the players get the$ 188 (m) the owners owe them under the escrow system...plus whatever they earn playing in the Euro-leagues....but Kool I look at all previous earnings / contracts on both sides as payment in advance...so guess what -dumpster...
You're welcome in advance...
What do you think you mean by per se?
re-read my statement on how I view contracts and previous earnings on both sides and you have your answer...I'm a deep thinking -dumpster you have to put some mental elbow grease into it when you read my ...
I read it.re-read my statement on how I view contracts and previous earnings on both sides and you have your answer...I'm a deep thinking -dumpster you have to put some mental elbow grease into it when you read my ...
Besides being wrong, it's a fair bet you don't know what per se means either.
Tell us what you know about the television contract with the owners, Kool.
ok....then make my day...instead of attacking me prove me wrong with some intellect...why don't you vet yourself by proving the stereotype that gay men are smart....
TV contracts....we're talking money earned through BRI....outside of that no one on either side will hurt for money....not even last years rookies....I could bring up endorsement deals that most players have doesn't disprove anything when it comes to my argument.
There is no BRI right now as there is no CBA.
This is wrong per se.
exactly...my point...you're proving to be a dumb gay by not logically following an argument...and I thought gay men were smart...
There is no BRI because BRI is a term used in the CBA.exactly...my point...you're proving to be a dumb gay by not logically following an argument...and I thought gay men were smart...
There is definitely still income that would be counted toward a BRI if there was a CBA -- income of which you are completely ignorant.
lol logically following
you're a stupid gay...dam...but of course there is no BRI at this very moment...BINGO....my point exactly...so therefore outside of what the owners owe the the players through the escrow system....nothing earned through a mutual player / owner relationship...you erroneously brought up TV contracts as you thought it was a valid point. But players have multiple income streams as well. as owners...and not all teams have lucrative TV deals btw....your point is as flawed as your sexual orientation.
They all have the same national TV deal.
You truly have no idea what you are saying.
ohh really....even though it's a side issue for a losing argument.... educate me...how much are they earning thorugh that TV deal while no games are being broadcast...
and for the record I don't think Dr. Buss will be sharing is stake in his new deal for the Lakers:
http://sports.yahoo.com/nba/blog/bal...urn=nba-321818
The owners get a loan to the tune of about $30 million each.ohh really....even though it's a side issue for a losing argument.... educate me...how much are they earning thorugh that TV deal while no games are being broadcast...
The players did get 8% of last years' salary from the escrow fund each.
Which do you think will last longer?
trying to create another wedge issue cuz you lost an argument aye? The owners are richer - Ray Charles can see that...but it's not the point numnuts....
Looking for this to help you out?
http://www.welcometoloudcity.com/201...cal-tv-revenue
That has the figure I already gave.trying to create another wedge issue cuz you lost an argument aye? The owners are richer - Ray Charles can see that...but it's not the point numnuts....
Looking for this to help you out?
http://www.welcometoloudcity.com/201...cal-tv-revenue
Thanks for confirming it.
A little late, but you probably still don't understand anything anyway.
ohh and help me out...what does loan mean...is that part of the net profit...
and how much will be allocated during the lockout....
OK, you don't even know what a loan is.ohh and help me out...what does loan mean...is that part of the net profit...
No problem.
is allotment per team and loan interchangeable words....do they get paid this "loan" upfront...
The amount is the same.
I'm just seeing how little you know about all of this.
It's even less than I thought. Pretty entertaining.
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)
Posting Permissions
