Results 1 to 8 of 8
  1. #1
    Realistic Spurs Fan Amuseddaysleeper's Avatar
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    Oct 2004
    Post Count
    17,732
    SAN ANTONIO SPURS

    Abrams: So long, Richard Jefferson. He's set to make $9.3 million, $10.1 million, and $11 million over the next three years.

    Simmons: And even after they dump him, they're still at $66.2 million for 14 guys next year. If there's a hard cap, or even a semi-flaccid cap, they're still screwed unless they can turn Tony Parker ($50 million through 2015) into a significantly cheaper point guard (like Ricky Rubio or Kyle Lowry). I think it's fascinating that (a) Spurs owner Peter Holt has the most juice of any owner in this lockout, (b) the owners are pushing for a hard cap, and (c) no 2011-12 team would be more screwed over by a hard cap than the Spurs.


    This article is pretty hilarious

    http://www.grantland.com/story/_/id/...amnesty-20-nba

  2. #2
    TheDrewShow is salty lefty's Avatar
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    Oct 2006
    Post Count
    101,216
    Love your sig

  3. #3
    Veteran Mel_13's Avatar
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    Jul 2006
    Post Count
    14,367
    Gotta love Simmons. First he was ready to exchange Tony for Randy Foye, now he suggests Rubio or Lowry.

  4. #4
    The Timeless One Leetonidas's Avatar
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    Apr 2005
    Post Count
    29,609
    Seeing as how the owners have already conceded on that issue, I wouldn't worry about it

  5. #5
    Realistic Spurs Fan Amuseddaysleeper's Avatar
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    Oct 2004
    Post Count
    17,732
    Thanks buddy


    And yeah, Tony for Rubio or Lowry would just be dumb.

  6. #6
    OH YOU LIKE IT!!! slick'81's Avatar
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    Jul 2009
    Post Count
    18,493
    lol lowry

  7. #7
    Bruce Almighty Bruno's Avatar
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    Jul 2005
    Post Count
    19,194
    A hard cap would be great for Spurs and Spurs fans should celebrate if it happens.

    In the short time, it could hurt them with all the big contracts they had but you had to look at the bigger picture:

    First, Spurs are done as a contender. Even a friendly cap system won't save them. If a hard cap hurt them, they haven't a lot to loose. It could even be a good thing because it will give them better draft picks for the future.

    Second, Spurs are a small market team. A hard cap will help them to compete against biggest market when/if they get relevant again because it will close the financial gap Spurs have against team like Mavs and Lakers.

  8. #8
    Don't stop believin' Dex's Avatar
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    Nov 2004
    Post Count
    27,659
    NEW JERSEY NETS

    Abrams: Travis Outlaw. One of last summer's questionable signings (five years, $35 million) that became worse as the season dragged along.

    Simmons: Here's why we're having a lockout — because teams are so effing stupid that they actually need to waive guys they just signed a year ago. There should be bonus amnesty points for being total morons. The Nets should get to wipe twice the amount of Outlaw's contract off their cap, like how disabled people get to park in disabled-person spaces.

Thread Information

Users Browsing this Thread

There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •