Reply With Quote
running off that dumb
where are you you red head ? What happened to the Colts being fine without Peyton
Omg. The sky is falling! The sky is falling!!
Good grief. I am so sick of this story, and I'm sick of the people in this town speculating that the team will win very few games, if any, simply because Peyton is out.
Get a grip, people. Collins isn't a bad option. He's been in this situation before, and he's working with a veteran team. They'll be fine. It could be Painter, after all.
The most unfortunate part of all of this is if it ends Peyton's career. He deserves better than that.
I guess, if anything, we'll find out who the true fans are through this.
Get better, Peyton!
I'm not exactly certain but it appears that SFF might not know the exact coordinates of where the gold is located
True fan = stop posting once your team sucks
SpursFanFirst
Ain't nobody in the proximity of the Indianapolis Metropolitan area thought the current group with Peyton Manning absent would score more points over a 60 minute span than the other team but Spursfanfirst
They'll be back like laughing after they punk the league when they get back Peyton and drafting Luck.True fan = stop posting once your team sucks
So either on them hard now or be cool and maybe they wont on you next year.
I would analyze specific parts of this post and go to great depths about its stupidity, but I don't feel like explaining how losing 62-7 isn't punking anybody. All I'll say is this post was really re ed.
Losing 62-7 is punking everyone. It's basically saying we wont even try this season so do your best to "beat" us up and we'll just see you next year with a top 5 or maybe even the 1st pick...try and see if you can do it again.
So many beta male gots who've probably never gotten laid ITT. Jesus Christ.
Closest thing to a Manning the Cards had was Kurt Warner and even he is not an elite QB..not a fair comparison.
Tell me, honestly. Do you think with Manning as the QB, they will lose 62-7 to the saints or to any other team?
That's irrelevant. Obviously not. The point was that's re ed to imply the Colts having a season is in any way, "punking" the rest of the league.
Which matchup do you think will bring in more money to the city of Indianapolis this year for the Superbowl?
Packers vs Patriots or Packers vs Colts?
That's why I think this " ty" season is more of a financial move...hence the re ed comment of why Indy is punking everyone by not even trying.
They'll just let Peyton heal properly, get good draft positions and let's see you try that again next year.
holy that's re ed
seriously, that's more re ed than anything ducks has said on this forum, and he once said that baseball players have Bird rights.
The Colts flat out quitting because they don't have Peyton doesn't show they're "punking" anybody, it shows they're a flaccid, gutless organization full of ing pussies who realize that they ed up when they gave one player as much power and influence that they gave Peyton.
Whether Peyton comes back or not, this organization is ed. They've all shown their true colors when adversity struck. Nobody in that organization will every trust one another again, even after Peyton returns.
I would kill myself before I would root for my team to tank.
Mono and DoK's lame Colts bashing schtick aside the most re ed thing said ITT was that Kurt Warner was not an elite QB. Colts will be fine and in the playoffs next year.
Saying Kurt Warner isn't an elite QB is less re ed than saying the Colts are punking the league this year.
Re ed or not you know I made sense.
And I love KW to death but he was not elite anymore when he was with the Cards.
No, I seriously don't think you made sense. The Colts didn't make some calculated effort to go after Luck, they're 0-7 because they're a ty in team.
I do agree KW's eliteness with the Cardinals was overrated (however taking the biggest abortion in professional football to the playoffs twice and the superbowl once makes me reconsider that) tho, but what made him special here was being an elite redzone QB. The Cardinals could trade 3 point drives for 7 point drives with Warner, something they sure as can't do with Kolb, the worst redzone QB I've ever seen.
I did not say they made a calculated effort to get Luck next year because that is re ed...I mean, they just gave Manning a new contract, right?
Point Im trying to make is I will not rag on the Colts because they are a team that will not all of a sudden will lose by 50 points.
No motivation to win this year because no Manning means no Superbowl.
City gets more money.
Team gets better players from the draft position.
Star QB can heal and rehab better.
They will not lose fans either...but Coltfan will be disgusted to the point they will not post about their team anymore.
I'm ragging on a Colts fan who said the Colts would be fine without Manning. It seems like a simple concept.
Oh. Commence trolling then.
lol philippines
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)
Posting Permissions
