Reply With Quote
He's the only ing normal one.
Is there anyone who seriously doubts this inevitable conclusion?
It seemed readily obvious to me a while back.
, when Pat Crazy-itis Robertson says you are collectively bat crazy right, it seems time to find the guy closer to the center.
Seems like the choice will be between the giant bag and sandwich again.
He's the only ing normal one.
"normal" for the US population, sure.
The problem for the GOP is that the other candidates seem to be the "normal" for the GOP. The bigger problem for the GOP is that they don't recognize this problem.
I feel sorry for the sane wing of the Republican party.
Worst election since Bush/Gore. LOL democracy
Least grossly abnormal is probably a better characterization.
as normal as someone named "Mitt" can be...
i don't like Mitt and i don't like any of the other candidates. if this is all the GOP can put forth i might not even vote.
If he wasn't a Mormon, he would already be the GOP nominee. Though he will anyways.
Jon Huntsman?
Good point. I could actually hold my nose and almost vote for him.
In the end though I would want to keep the crazies in the GOP as far away from positions of power in the executive branch as possible.
Any Republican president would be forced to appoint some of the crazies somewhere. (shudders)
that.
Romney.
Does anyone think Mitt ing Romney has any solution to anything; if he is not the definition of "same old, same old" I don't know what is. Nothing original, nothing daring; milquetoast - I'll vote Obama (has been worse than I thought he would be, btw)- just to make sure we keep divided govt.
If the country chooses a Republican now; in 4 years they can choose a generic Dem; we continue our slide to oblivion. This country NEEDS different; we CANNOT keep barreling down the path of crony capitalism; there is NOT a hairs breadth difference between what Romney and Obama bring to the table other than the name of their teams.
Oh, and Massachusetts? Dukakis, Kerry, etc.....Americans DON'T vote for these guys!!! Stop nominating them!!!
Must be the whole New Hampshire effect; gives them unwarranted early momentum.
I hope Paul runs as a third party; at least give me someone to vote for I don't despise.
Only way this is going to change is by cons utional amendment to address the influnce of firms and organizations as well as eliminate the single member district that dominates the political landscape.
I do not necessarily want to the same choices as you but I think wec an both agree that we want more choices. Our electoral process is a joke.
Like I said, I feel sorry for your wing of the party.
I wish Buddy Roemer was getting more play.
Romney will win by default. !!!!
I was really hoping Paul Ryan would run. I could easily see him holding his own in a debate vs. Obama. Problem is, he believes in serious en lement reform, which is badly needed (here and in EU), but is widely unpopular.
And he is never going to so much as sniff the nomination with all the baby boomers dominating the electorate. SS/Medicare are sacred cows because of it.
Nah, Ryan bribed the boomers and planned to have every later generation make the sacrifice.
What is TARP?
(In fairness it shd be mentioned that Mr.Ryan was against it, before he was for it.)
the big money (financial sector) will go to the predatory job-destroyer/asset-stripper from Bain Capital.
If Romney wins nom by default, Obama wins by default.
FOUR MORE YEARS!!!
Yay!
Who do you think could beat him?
Huntsman would be better, IMO.
The GOP should have the election in the bag considering the unemployment rate, the economy and Obama's approval rating. But we'll see. Obama is the underdog in this election.
Ginghrich is gaining
except the GOP has a circus freak show as their candidates.
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)
Posting Permissions
