Reply With Quote
It's not an enforcement of Newt however.
Seen the things she says about Ron Paul? Here's one:
Sarah Palin Defends Ron Paul: He’s The Only One ‘Doing Something About Reining In Gov’t Growth’
http://www.mediaite.com/tv/sarah-pal...newt-gingrich/
Sarah Palin was fairly busy over the weekend, writing an extensive post calling out Republican “Stalinesque” “cannibalism,” reappropriating the term “Rage Against the Machine” for Newt Gingrich, and all but endorsing the former House Speaker. On tonight’s Hannity, Palin continued to abstain from an official endorsement, but demanded of Republicans a vigorous nomination process that would guarantee a win for a “big dog” that could take down President Obama.
RELATED: Sarah Palin’s Facebook: ‘Reagan Would Be Ashamed’ Of ‘Stalin-esque’ GOP ‘Cannibal’ Tactics
Sean Hannity noted that Palin had said that, as a South Carolina voter, she would vote for Gingrich, and wondered if anything had changed. Palin responded that she wanted to “keep the process going” to find “who is best able to defend our republic,” and that the process must find “who has been sharpened and shaped through the school of hard knocks the most.” We need a big dog,” she continued, one capable of defeating the President.
Palin acknowledged that things had gotten “vicious” in the Republican party, and that she did not believe that gratuitous attacks were warranted, but “what I will call people on is when they choose to lie about a candidate.” ‘I’m not whining about the viciousness,” she notes, but the “rewritten history” about Gingrich got to her. “Enough is enough with the lies about Newt Gingrich.”
~~She sure does know how to keep her book selling self out there.
It's not an enforcement of Newt however.
Seen the things she says about Ron Paul? Here's one:
Sarah Palin Defends Ron Paul: He’s The Only One ‘Doing Something About Reining In Gov’t Growth’
endorsement?
People love her, but the people who hate her love her even more. Howard Stern effect.
LOL...
Ever listen to Michael Savage?
Funny that she says that she's not whining about viciousness, but the headline says she denounces it.
At first it seemed like she just wanted someone to keep testing Romney, but she's gotten a bit too tied up in defending Newt, and it looks like she's in his camp, whether or not that's the intent.
I think overall, she prefers Paul, though she doesn't want to endorse anyone.
Just my opinion... Don't make too much of it.
lol GOP having to go back to Reagan to find a good repuke.
good thing to see her still taking it to the good ole boys
Domestically, most conservatives would prefer Paul, but they know that the easiest things for a president to do are foreign policy and military related, and Paul would be a disaster. She's probably like most people and hoping that Rubio or Daniels change their mind.
Either way her political career is pretty much over.
Looking forward to the inevitable third party run, personally.
That may have been the case in the past. Now, fewer and fewer people give a about her.
She needs to make hay while the sun shines, that's for sure.
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)
Posting Permissions
