Reply With Quote
its like advancing your pawn to the last row and choosing to bring in a pawn
why is bonnet still in a close game.
its like advancing your pawn to the last row and choosing to bring in a pawn
Because he spreads the floor. Duh.
and he's clutch as
...think of anything??
I liked wontstartdumbthreads better.
that's not even possible
He's better than Blair.Both suck but Bonner can play some similar to defense sometimes.
Blair would be more of the knight, the short fatass that jumps around
I am convinced that Bonner has more game than Steve N. That is Novak, not Nash.
Bonner>Dirk
very true, starts off the game half of the time and dies 10 moves in, we'll move Diaw to be the knight
If Aminu acid and Jack rabbit can play for the Hornys why not have a Boner...just saying.
RJ was the queen. Not in chess, just in general.
Bonner is a decent chess piece, Pop just uses the weakest openings.
Because they're the Hornets....
stop hating on the turd man, you guys only show up when he has a game
what i want to see him improve that defenders are continuing allowing him to do....pumpfake attacking the rim for some bull shot, if he can hit those freebees would be sweet to his arsenal, then defenders would be forced to keep a tab on him and continue to spread the floor
his defense, but the effort is there and his not afraid to hand out hard fouls which he doesnt give a
Didn't you get the memo?! We can tell anymore gay RJ jokes!
I would argue that Dejuan Blair is the king on this chess board. Seriously, think about.
Or, 3 moves in.
I would consider Leonard and Green the knights and Manu/Jackson the rooks, because they're long rangers who are always there at the end. Not to mention, they support the king (Timmy) the most.
- He is very limited in what he does to contribute to the game
- He requires everyone else to watch out for him and clean up his messes
- Failure to mask his shortcomings usually causes the game to end early
Dude did you watch the game? Bonner did a really good job on defense and rebounding. His shots weren't there as they decided to bring his man out so he only got 2 shots making 1. But that spread the floor. He was +7 tied with Duncan for best plus-minus.
yet in the endgame, the king is the strongest piece, blair is definately not clutch, timmy is the king, he steps it up at the end and can do everything
I would say Jackson is the h/g pawn always the first to be pushed in an attack and would sacrifice themselves for the attack
Or, 3 moves in.
I would consider Leonard and Green the knights and Manu/Jackson the rooks, because they're long rangers who are always there at the end. Not to mention, they support the king (Timmy) the most.
Is the King the strongest piece? Sure, if hes compromised the game ends. But hes also the most vulnerable. If you take the King on the attack you're likely to lose. He should be kept back and guarded at all costs.
Dejuan is the same way. In order for him to be successful in a compe ive game you need to make a deliberate effort to hide his glaring weaknesses.
good point, but in the end when all is said and done and the pieces are off the board, timmy comes up big, that's when the king mainly does his thing. I would argue that Timmy needs to be somewhat protected by limiting his minutes as he is older and weaker like the king. Yes, the king is the most vulnerable but it is also the one piece that you can't play a game without, can we play a game without Blair? Yes Definately. Duncan? I would say no, he's probably still the most important of the Big 3 as he's the defensive anchor.
Eh, both analogies have merit.
I see both sides.
You guys really need to stop with the chess analogies...
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)
Posting Permissions
