Official Galileo (Rolf Lindgren) 9/11 theory thread

[ChumpDumper]

The greatest logical fallacy of RandomGuy is that the government insiders on 9/11 would not want to kill thousands of people. RandomGuy thinks people in the gubiment are nice fellows who would not do that sort of thing. But of course, governments kill at a pace that exceeds anything the private sector could hope for. Over 100 million people were murdered by government employees in the 20th century, a new century record. You see, the gubiment has a monopoly on force.

OK, this is the start of a theory.

Now you need to tell us which insiders you suspect and how you think they did it.

This is your big chance. We are waiting.

[Galileo]

Let's start with Cheney....

[ChumpDumper]

So start. No one is stopping you.

[Galileo]

Start with Cheney, then continue on with Donald Rumsfeld. These guys got no qualms.

[Galileo]

Here is what the experts say about 9/11:

“20 Reasons the “Official Account” of 9/11 is Wrong”
http://www.veteranstoday.com/2011/09...-911-is-wrong/


“Peeling the 9/11 Onion: Layers of Plots within Plots”
http://www.veteranstoday.com/2011/08...-within-plots/



“9/11 and the Neo-Con Agenda”
http://www.amfirstbooks.com/IntroPag...on_Agenda.html



“Is 9/11 Research ‘anti-Semitic’?”
http://www.opednews.com/articles/Is-...090615-95.html

[Wild Cobra]

Here is what the experts say about 9/11:

“20 Reasons the “Official Account” of 9/11 is Wrong”
http://www.veteranstoday.com/2011/09...-911-is-wrong/


“Peeling the 9/11 Onion: Layers of Plots within Plots”
http://www.veteranstoday.com/2011/08...-within-plots/



“9/11 and the Neo-Con Agenda”
http://www.amfirstbooks.com/IntroPag...on_Agenda.html



“Is 9/11 Research ‘anti-Semitic’?”
http://www.opednews.com/articles/Is-...090615-95.html

Fail...

Place it all in your words.

[Galileo]

Fail...

Place it all in your words.

you're not an expert.

[Blake]

Start with Cheney, then continue on with Donald Rumsfeld. These guys got no qualms.

What exactly did Cheney do?

[Jim Fetzer]

I take it that Blake, Wild Cobra, and ChumpDumper are not avid readers. Perhaps that is why they don't have a clue when it comes to 9/11. I recommend that they read the four articles I authored about 9/11, which are able as easy an intro as you could have. Since I wrote them, if you read them, then I will be glad to field any serious questions you have.

[Blake]

It would be awesome if you were the real Jim Fetzer.

[Galileo]

It would be awesome if you were the real Jim Fetzer.

That is the real Jim Fetzer. I can tell by his writing style.

[Blake]

That is the real Jim Fetzer. I can tell by his writing style.

no reason to believe either of you

[ChumpDumper]

you're not an expert.

This is not a thread for "experts" or links.

Just tell us what you think really happened on 9/11.

[ChumpDumper]

I take it that Blake, Wild Cobra, and ChumpDumper are not avid readers. Perhaps that is why they don't have a clue when it comes to 9/11. I recommend that they read the four articles I authored about 9/11, which are able as easy an intro as you could have. Since I wrote them, if you read them, then I will be glad to field any serious questions you have.

Sure, let's assume you are who you say you are.

Thanks, I've read far too much on this subject and am familiar with your work.

My serious question to you is -- what do you think really happened on 9/11?

I'm not looking for a bunch of links to poorly written articles and YouTubes with spooky synth music. I'm looking for one person who can say, in some credible detail, who they think did it, how they did it and why. Your articles are lacking a real definitive theory. After a full decade of research dedicated to this subject, I really think you should be farther along than your articles indicate.

I'll make you a thread so everyone will be able to see you commit to an actual theory.

[jack sommerset]

I take it that Blake, Wild Cobra, and ChumpDumper are not avid readers. Perhaps that is why they don't have a clue when it comes to 9/11. I recommend that they read the four articles I authored about 9/11, which are able as easy an intro as you could have. Since I wrote them, if you read them, then I will be glad to field any serious questions you have.

Nice. Blake, chump and wc lumped into one category. There is hope. God bless

[ChumpDumper]

Nice. Blake, chump and wc lumped into one category. There is hope. God bless

Snark is not God's plan.

[Galileo]

Sure, let's assume you are who you say you are.

Thanks, I've read far too much on this subject and am familiar with your work.

My serious question to you is -- what do you think really happened on 9/11?

I'm not looking for a bunch of links to poorly written articles and YouTubes with spooky synth music. I'm looking for one person who can say, in some credible detail, who they think did it, how they did it and why. Your articles are lacking a real definitive theory. After a full decade of research dedicated to this subject, I really think you should be farther along than your articles indicate.

I'll make you a thread so everyone will be able to see you commit to an actual theory.

no way you can match wits with Fetzer!

[ChumpDumper]

no way you can match wits with Fetzer!

No way he'll post an actual theory.

Just like you aren't in this thread.

[Galileo]

No way he'll post an actual theory.

Just like you aren't in this thread.

What's yer theory? Do ya think WTC 7 fell down by itself?

[SA210]

[ChumpDumper]

What's yer theory?

I have been quite clear about what I think really happened on 9/11.

You have not.

This is your chance to tell everyone. Why are you refusing such an opportunity?

[Vici]

Still waiting.

[Blake]

[Nbadan]

No way he'll post an actual theory.

Just like you aren't in this thread.

Why does there have to be another theory? There is a theory out there..

Let's see if it will stand on it's own merits...

[Blake]

Why does there have to be another theory? There is a theory out there..

Let's see if it will stand on it's own merits...

What theory are you referring to?