Page 1 of 2 12 LastLast
Results 1 to 25 of 33
  1. #1
    Nbadan
    Guest
    Line em up, snort them down....

    NEW YORK, Sept. 13 /PRNewswire/ -- The following is a statement by Doubleday regarding Kitty Kelley: In an appearance on the Today Show on Monday, September 13, 2004, Sharon Bush repeated a denial she made earlier last week. After telling Kitty Kelley that she had knowledge of President George W. Bush "doing cocaine" at Camp David -- "not once, but many times," Mrs. Bush now denies that statement.

    This denial has already been utterly discredited by a third party to the meeting at which Mrs. Bush made the statements. Doubleday and Kitty Kelley, author of "The Family: The Real Story of the Bush Dynasty," firmly uphold the accuracy and veracity of reporting on this topic. Further, Doubleday and Ms. Kelley affirm that Mrs. Bush was read her comments on the day following the meeting in a telephone conversation, lasting over an hour, that was witnessed by Random House Vice President Peter Gethers -- that those comments included her remarks on cocaine use at Camp David -- and that she once again agreed that these comments were true.

    The following are undisputable facts:

    -- Mrs. Bush confirmed that she was aware of cocaine use by President George W. Bush at Camp David when his father was President

    -- Mrs. Bush confirmed that such usage occurred on more than one occasion

    -- Mrs. Bush knew that Ms. Kelley planned on using this information in her book and was read the exact quotes that would be utilized

    -- Mrs. Bush continued to have a good relationship with Kitty Kelley -- long after the meeting in April at which she confirmed the cocaine report

    -- Mrs. Bush called Ms. Kelley in May, 2004 after which there was a friendly correspondence.

    Additionally, Today Show host Matt Lauer and Mrs. Bush suggested that Kitty Kelley had a "relationship" with Lou Colasuonno, a public relations executive who witnessed the April 1, 2003 lunch meeting between Kitty Kelley and Sharon Bush. Kitty Kelley had never met or spoken with Mr. Colasuonno prior to April 1, 2003. Kitty Kelley has never had and does not have any personal, social or financial relationship with Mr. Colasuonno.
    PR Newswire

  2. #2
    bigzak25
    Guest
    and how many people could overcome a coke habit and become president.....that's a uva man. 2

  3. #3
    DeSPURado
    Guest
    Then went on to lie about it. Man what a uva man.

  4. #4
    Yonivore
    Guest
    Wait a minute...I just saw in another thread where Nbadan wouldn't trust the word of another person...where's the irrefutable proof?

  5. #5
    DeSPURado
    Guest
    That was me you idiot.

  6. #6
    Yonivore
    Guest
    I'm sorry, sometimes you two are indistinguishable.

  7. #7
    Hook Dem
    Guest

  8. #8
    Tommy Duncan
    Guest
    Oh so every accusation against Bush based on rumor, 3rd grade style fakes, and Kitty Kelley's pen is true.

    Go figure.

  9. #9
    DeSPURado
    Guest
    declarations against interest are generally given more wieght by a court of law. But you wouldn't know about that would you?

  10. #10
    Tommy Duncan
    Guest
    Numbnuts, this is the court of public opinion.

    You're right, I've never claimed I was an attorney. God you are pathetic.

  11. #11
    DeSPURado
    Guest
    There you go again being an ass.

    Have I said that it should apply to everyone?

  12. #12
    Tommy Duncan
    Guest
    Awww, is you mad?

    What is the relevance of your statement then? F'in A.

  13. #13
    DeSPURado
    Guest
    You asked me if I believed it.

  14. #14
    Tommy Duncan
    Guest
    ...in the political realm. I never said a court of law.

    Did I question you specifically?

  15. #15
    Spurminator
    Guest
    So Sharon Bush is a liar. And each side believes she lied about a different assertion. Not surprising.

    Also not relevant.

    At worst, this is simply more evidence that George Bush would not have made a good President 14 to 40 years ago.

    WHO ING GIVES A ****?

  16. #16
    DeSPURado
    Guest
    Thats all it boils down to is it? Who gives a ****? Well personally I do. The kind of character who would abuse cocaine (making him a felon and thus not able to vote for himself in florida) and abuse alcohol has no place in the white house. To answer your question I give a ****.

  17. #17
    SpursWoman
    Guest
    Well, damn. Maybe he didn't actually inhale it.







    WTF is Ted Kennedy still doing in public office, btw?

  18. #18
    Spurminator
    Guest
    You give a **** because it's Bush.

    Don't pretend that if Bill Clinton had a drug history you would hold it against him.

    I can't believe that in such a controversial 4 year term, this and a questionable Air National Guard service is all you guys can talk about 2 months before the election.

  19. #19
    DeSPURado
    Guest
    Hey clinton did have a drug history. He smoked pot. I got nothing wrong with potheads. It doesn't lead to violent paranoia. I have a problem with electing people who have taken certain drugs. And not all drugs are the same. Alcohol abuse combined with cocaine use is typical of a very specific personality type. Of which Bush fits very easily.

  20. #20
    Tommy Duncan
    Guest
    Actually there were rumors that Clinton did coke, including while he was Pres.

    But those rumors involved a Demo politician so they don't count.

  21. #21
    Spurminator
    Guest
    I find your standards very convenient.

    And I still say bull . You wouldn't give two s if Clinton had shot heroin with Kurt Cobain in 1991.


    But that's neither here nor there. You're free to have whatever standards you want... I just think these particular crusades are fruitless.

  22. #22
    SpursWoman
    Guest
    Clinton used coke?

    possibly?

    Nah...no way!

    Maybe just a little?

    hmmm....



    "I did NOT have nasal relations with that bump"

  23. #23
    Tommy Duncan
    Guest
    I, for one, think this development is troubling because it could prove that George W. Bush is a meanie.

  24. #24
    Spurminator
    Guest
    Here we have one of the most controversial Presidents in US History running for reelection... one who has presided over an economy that has gone in the tank after a decade of prosperity, one who has taken us into a war against the wishes of many of our allies and a huge percentage of the population.... and two months before the Election, the most prevalent arguments against him are that he may have missed a medical examination in the Air national Guard in the early Seventies, and that he has been accused of snorting cocaine in the past.

    I smell a rat. The Democrats must be trying to lose for some reason. If I was a Democrat, I wouldn't be wasting my time arguing about 30-year old do ents and sensationalist election season books... I'd be writing the DNC saying "WHAT THE **** ARE YOU DOING?!?!"

  25. #25
    DeSPURado
    Guest
    I would give a . I wouldn't vote for him Nor am I voting for Clinton right now. I never have voted for Clinton. I was a republican at the time.

Thread Information

Users Browsing this Thread

There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •