Only in the third game. In the second, OKC only got it down to 12 and there was around 3 minutes left.
from what i've read, it seems like the two games the spurs won, the spurs had built very big leads only to see them dwindle nearly to nothing. seems worrisome.
Only in the third game. In the second, OKC only got it down to 12 and there was around 3 minutes left.
Spurs didn't have Manu, Diaw, or Jax, and still dominated. Now all three are (relatively) healthy. We're a much better team than the last time we played the Thunder and we crushed them.
Will be a good series though.
Notice that they can never complete the comeback.
Lakers choking had much to do with the thunder comeback
Plus....Richard Jefferson started in the first 2 games.![]()
Against other teams they comeback and against us they just make the score more respectable. I'm also sure if we get up big pop will keep the pressure on till its a done deal.
Yet they won. Whats the playoffs without worry.
the one game your refering to is the game where spurs lay the beatdown so hard in teh first half and stopped caring after that and let the scrubs play
westbrook basically just started launching midrange shots since they had no other hope and most of them fell
if spurs kept going hard they wouldnt be close
right when you thought OKC was out of it, they came in and took the Supersonics with a last minute manuever.
the comebacks against the mavs and lakers were not flukes. if it was just one or two games, then yeah, one can argue they were flukes. but to rally back multiple times against playoff tested teams and hall of fame players is no accident. this thunder team is growing up and can do the same against the spurs if the spurs aren't careful.
The Clippers were a comeback team as well and we handled them just fine. You just have to weather the storm of the surge and play your game. Spurs are battle-tested enough to handle the pressure of a comeback team, it ain't their first rodeo.
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)