Reply With Quote
He has no Ubuntu. They'll be disappointed.
He has no Ubuntu. They'll be disappointed.
how about a sign n trade instead? avery bradley looks like an amazing defender
So it's not actually a rumor.
It's pretty simple
We match a reasonable offer or let him go if Boston overpays. i doubt they offer more than 3m though.
We need a tough PG, if Green wants out, we need to shop options.
Fair deal: Rondo for Green and TP
Boston has a of a lot more cash than SA. . .so they can easily afford to "overpay" for their whole team if need be. They'll still be in the black. Same with the Lakers, Bulls, Knicks, and other large market teams.
I'm not sure if the Spurs offense can function with a pass first PG. Rondo doesn't shot well, Parker drives better too. But tbh Rondo patiently reads the defense than sets high % shots for the team mates. To have such a PG is like having a dominant bigman. He's a great defensive player, can guard well SG's too.
why would boston give up rondo, a younger more athletic PG, for tony parker, a 30 yr old PG, where it's arguable that rondo is more or less equivalent or even better than parker, along with his youth/potential?
it takes a year or two years for players to know each other replacing tp with rhonda would be step backwards
it took duncan 2 years to start trusting tp
Cool. They get Green. We get KG.
This offensive is all about ball movement - Pop would give his left nut to have a pass first point guard, that's why we've tried to get Chris Paul and Jason Kidd in the past.
Where in the did we ever try to get chris paul? ur such a trolll
Spurs can bring back Malik Hairston for a fraction of what Green might cost.
He's had two very good years, has lots of experience now, including clutch shots at Pionir, to keep Milano in the Euroleague top 16.
Anyone who can make shots at Pionir in the 4th will have no problems with NBA playoffs.
Tough kid.
Great. So, instead of keeping a guy who at least hits three pointers MOST of the time, we go get Hairston, who never hits them?
In this offense, you cannot be a wing or guard and get playing time if you don't have a three pointer.
Danny Green. He's a . Toss him in the same pile as Matt Bonner.
I'd say that Hariston 48% in Euroleague and 42% in the Italian league from 3 is not exactly never hitting them.
Unless Hairston is coming for the minimum, he'll require either the LLE or a portion of the MLE. We can resign Green on an Early Bird exception, leaving us free to use our other exceptions on other players.
I'll let Green walk. Instead, use the money to sign a decent backup PG. Ginobili should start at SG and Neal be his backup.
No, keep Green.
I wonder what Spurs would do if he's offered >2.5 M /3 years.
Danny Green is trash but Hairston is even tier tbh....
Keep Green unless anyone else is prepared to overpay him... then let him go.
It's unfortunate but he didn't just fall off a cliff, he fell off a mountain. His defense becoming absolute garbage overnight is extremely discouraging, much more so than his shot drying up when the pressure hit.
Keeping Green without overpaying him should be one of the Spurs top priorities in the offseason. Some of you overreact to too much...these were Greens first playoffs and first season with significant playing time. He definitely faded at the end but I think overall he did really well this year.
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)
Posting Permissions
