Results 1 to 11 of 11
  1. #1
    Believe.
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    Sep 2011
    Post Count
    216
    Do we have money next offseason? I know Ginobili, Jackson, and Tiago are coming off the payroll, but do we have enough to lure say Ibaka to SA? I know Ginobili and Jackson will certainly take a pay cut and Tiago's future with the team seems to cloudy. But I am just wondering if we have the option to big players in the free agent market (ignoring the fact that SA doesn't attract free agents)

  2. #2
    Every game is game 1 Seventyniner's Avatar
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    Jul 2009
    Post Count
    10,608
    ~$14.2M in cap space next summer if my numbers are right. Shamsports shows ~$20.3M in committed salaries for 2013-2014 (including Leonard's team option but not Joseph's, assuming the Spurs waive Bonner and only pay the $1M guaranteed, and that the Spurs pick up Splitter's QO) plus Duncan $10M, Diaw $4.5M, Green $4M, Mills $1M = $43.8M, assuming cap of around $58M like this season. Not enough for a max FA. Renouncing Splitter or salary-dumping Diaw or Green can increase this, but that's what it would take to get a max FA. Please correct me if I'm wrong on the numbers.

  3. #3
    Believe.
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    Sep 2011
    Post Count
    216
    So probably not enough to retain manu, jax, splitter and get a major free agent. Thanks

  4. #4
    Believe. Andthentherewas21's Avatar
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    Feb 2012
    Post Count
    544
    ~$14.2M in cap space next summer if my numbers are right. Shamsports shows ~$20.3M in committed salaries for 2013-2014 (including Leonard's team option but not Joseph's, assuming the Spurs waive Bonner and only pay the $1M guaranteed, and that the Spurs pick up Splitter's QO) plus Duncan $10M, Diaw $4.5M, Green $4M, Mills $1M = $43.8M, assuming cap of around $58M like this season. Not enough for a max FA. Renouncing Splitter or salary-dumping Diaw or Green can increase this, but that's what it would take to get a max FA. Please correct me if I'm wrong on the numbers.
    You forgot that both Jackson and Manu have cap-holds that count against the cap until they are renounced or signed. If they are signed, there goes the 14.8 in free space. Secondly even if they pick up Splitter's QO, he'll get offers at least similar to the $8 million Asik received.

  5. #5
    Every game is game 1 Seventyniner's Avatar
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    Jul 2009
    Post Count
    10,608
    You forgot that both Jackson and Manu have cap-holds that count against the cap until they are renounced or signed. If they are signed, there goes the 14.8 in free space. Secondly even if they pick up Splitter's QO, he'll get offers at least similar to the $8 million Asik received.
    I'm assuming that the Spurs renounce both Manu (retirement) and Jackson (not worth the cap hold). Splitter getting an Asik-like offer only increases the Spurs' cap space, because IMO there's no way the Spurs match a 5/5/14 deal like Asik's.

  6. #6
    Believe. Andthentherewas21's Avatar
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    Feb 2012
    Post Count
    544
    Then yes, we would have a fair amount of cap space. However then we are stuck with enough to offer around one max level contract, at the expense of a starting (borderline all-star when healthy) SG, the best backup Center in the league, and a pretty damn good (though currently overpaid) backup SF. Not to mention with Blair's contract being up, and Bonner's proposed buyout, the frontcourt would then only consist of Duncan and Diaw if Diaw decides not to opt out of his player option.

    Spurs should be set on guards though.

  7. #7
    Believe. Duncan2177's Avatar
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    May 2008
    Post Count
    1,908
    Is Josh Smith a free agent next summer?

  8. #8
    Watching the collapse benefactor's Avatar
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    Jul 2008
    Post Count
    42,233
    having money
    the Spurs luring free agents

  9. #9
    Hello Moto elemento's Avatar
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    Jul 2010
    Post Count
    3,101
    I'm assuming that the Spurs renounce both Manu (retirement) and Jackson (not worth the cap hold). Splitter getting an Asik-like offer only increases the Spurs' cap space, because IMO there's no way the Spurs match a 5/5/14 deal like Asik's.
    Teams can't offer a deal like that because the Arenas rule is not applied to Splitter. SA has full bird rights.

    SA can simply wait to give Splitter a new contract considering he only counts for his QO, manage to re-sign their FAs and then re-sign Splitter.

  10. #10
    Veteran Wild Cobra Kai's Avatar
    My Team
    Seattle Supersonics
    Join Date
    Oct 2007
    Post Count
    1,941
    Teams can't offer a deal like that because the Arenas rule is not applied to Splitter. SA has full bird rights.

    SA can simply wait to give Splitter a new contract considering he only counts for his QO, manage to re-sign their FAs and then re-sign Splitter.
    I don't want to waste that money on that mangina, Splitter.

  11. #11
    Hello Moto elemento's Avatar
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    Jul 2010
    Post Count
    3,101
    I don't want to waste that money on that mangina, Splitter.
    You may not want, but the Spurs FO may want.

Thread Information

Users Browsing this Thread

There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •