When this will stop?

[russellgoat]

http://www.inquisitr.com/335943/flor...iature-donkey/

Stop the discrimination!!! We must support the rights of people that like to have sex with animals!!!!

[Juggity]

Are you trying to create a false equivalency between this and sexuality? I've seen people make this argument often, and it's pretty easily refuted. I can go ahead and preempt it right now:

sexual & heterosexual activity, when practiced normally & within the bounds of the law, occurs between consenting adults.

In a bestial relationship, only 1 partner would be able to give consent, because the other is an animal and thus incapable of abstract thought, let alone speech.

So, if my su ions are correct and you are trying to establish bestiality and sexuality as legally or morally equivalent, you are pretty clearly incorrect.

[mavs>spurs]

but animals aren't human and don't have rights. are you trying to imply that animals consent before they are sent to slaughter?

[Spurminator]

Miniature donkeys are the tiest of all donkeys. Doodle was probably begging for it.

[AussieFanKurt]

5 star thread

[admiralsnackbar]

While I normally frown on news sites that use the name-spelling conventions of late 90's nu-metal bands, this story -- from this source -- seems apt.

[baseline bum]

You know someone has for brains when he compares consensual sex to animal rape.

[mavs>spurs]

it may be consensual but it's just as perverse imho

[AussieFanKurt]

Whilst this is a troll, it saddens and confuses me that there are actually people like this out there

[Jacob1983]

Wasn't AIDS created because of bestiality?

[ChumpDumper]

lol this thread

[Winehole23]

[Winehole23]

so he bring a genie donkey for me, and he tell me to walk it out gracefully . . .

[Winehole23]

don't do me that, no boss: if you bring me donkey, I loss

[Winehole23]

. . .that way I back now tackling donkey and all

[TDMVPDPOY]

speaking of donkeys, whatever happen to the poster on here midgeonadonkey??

[I. Hustle]

[scott]

Legitimate Rape

[Wild Cobra]

I feel sorry for those democrats.

[Clipper Nation]

Are you trying to create a false equivalency between this and sexuality? I've seen people make this argument often, and it's pretty easily refuted. I can go ahead and preempt it right now:

sexual & heterosexual activity, when practiced normally & within the bounds of the law, occurs between consenting adults.

In a bestial relationship, only 1 partner would be able to give consent, because the other is an animal and thus incapable of abstract thought, let alone speech.

So, if my su ions are correct and you are trying to establish bestiality and sexuality as legally or morally equivalent, you are pretty clearly incorrect.

Juggity with the Chocolate Thunder flyin', Robinzine cryin', teeth-shakin', glass-breakin', rump roastin', bun toastin', wham bam, glass breaker, I am jam, et al....

[cantthinkofanything]

Sorry, I'm a little late to the conversation. But how old is the animal in question?

[Koolaid_Man]

but animals aren't human and don't have rights. are you trying to imply that animals consent before they are sent to slaughter?

try abusing one in public and watch the cops haul you're re ed ass off to jail....


and for the record...I know for a fact my dogs eat better than you...in fact I cook for them..Steak, chicken, seafood, potato's and carrots..you name it..I love my dogs more than some people in my family...not all but some...

[Homeland Security]

The movement behind sexual marriage and other rights is a trememdous example of how canny the communists are.

sexual marriage concerns a tiny part of the population. Self-identified sexuals make up about 3% of the population. A minority of that group is even interested in long-term coupling, and fewer than that to identify said coupling as marriage. Relative to other trends which tend to erode the traditional concept of family, granting recognition to sexual relations would be a pittance.

Furthermore, if we were evaluating oppressive ins utions in terms of impact, the inability of sexuals directly to secure the legal rights implicit in marriage, rather than having to secure them through more complicated means, would rank rather far down the totem pole.

As a critical-theoretical vehicle towards Marxism, however, it is perfect. Its power in eroding the family (necessary in contemporary Marxist thought to overcome the cultural inertia obstructing the transition to socialism) is miniscule; however, it is close to the ne plus ultra among rhetorical vehicles to overturn the traditional morality by accentuating its contradictions.

[mavs>spurs]

try abusing one in public and watch the cops haul you're re ed ass off to jail....


and for the record...I know for a fact my dogs eat better than you...in fact I cook for them..Steak, chicken, seafood, potato's and carrots..you name it..I love my dogs more than some people in my family...not all but some...

So...you cooked an animal against its will and without it's consent? But you just said they have rights.

You should feed those ugly sons of es some grapes and chocolate.

[Homeland Security]

The communists think they've got this one won, and are probably right. Every so often you'll see one stick their toes in the water regarding a softening of the age of consent concept, which is the next milestone. The academics already have been publishing articles about the purported benefits of pederasty since the 1990's.