AFC
1. Houston
2. Baltimore
3. New England
4. Denver
5. Pittsburgh
NFC
1. Green Bay
2. NY Giants
3. Atlanta
4. San Francisco
5. Chicago
NFL
1. Houston
2. Baltimore
3. Green Bay
4. NY Giants
5. New England
AFC:
1. Houston
2. Baltimore (would be #1 if not for 3 huge defensive injuries).
3. New England
4. San Diego
5. Denver
NFC:
1. N.Y. Giants
2. Green Bay
3. Chicago
4. San Francisco
5. Atlanta
NFL:
1. N.Y. Giants
2. Green Bay
3. Houston
4. Chicago
5. Baltimore
AFC
1. Houston
2. Baltimore
3. New England
4. Denver
5. Pittsburgh
NFC
1. Green Bay
2. NY Giants
3. Atlanta
4. San Francisco
5. Chicago
NFL
1. Houston
2. Baltimore
3. Green Bay
4. NY Giants
5. New England
AFC:
1 Houston
2 Baltimore
3 New England
4 Denver
5 Pittsburgh
NFC
1 NY Giants
2 Atlanta
3 San Francisco
4 Green Bay
5 Chicago
NFL
1 NY Giants
2 Atlanta
3 San Francisco
4 Houston
5 New England
AFC:
1. Houston
2. Baltimore
3. San Diego (by default)
4. Denver (also by default)
5. New England (wow, the AFC is garbage this year)
NFC:
1. NY Giants
2. Atlanta
3. Chicago
4. San Francisco
5. Seattle
NFL:
1. NY Giants
2. Atlanta
3. Houston
4. Chicago
5. Baltimore
Last edited by Clipper Nation; 10-15-2012 at 10:49 PM.
AFC
1. Pats
2. Steelers
3. Texans
4. Baltimore ( but getting destroyed by injuries)
5. Chargers
NFC
1. Giants
2. Saints
3. Packers
4. Falcons
5. Cowboys
Why are people actually ranking tsburgh as a top-5 team in the AFC? They're third place in their division behind the Ravens and a -ass Bengals team, they're under .500, and they LOST to the woeful Raiders and ans, tbh....
I don't mind people putting Pittsburgh in the AFC Top 5...fact of the matter is the conference blows, and the Steelers will more than likely turn it around.
If Denver wins tonight then only Baltimore and Houston will have +.500 records in the AFC.
1. New England
2. Houston without Cushing
3. Denver
4. Baltimore without Lewis/Webb and others
5. San Diego/Pittsburgh/Denver/Buffalo/Cinci/Miami/New York
1. New York
2. Green Bay
3. Atlanta
4. San Francisco
5. Chicago
Last edited by Malik Hairston; 10-15-2012 at 10:35 PM.
Still can't buy into Atlanta...they're still a soft team
Agree that Atlanta is soft and they're perennial chokers, but the alternatives have Jay Cutler and Alex Smith, tbh..
The Pats are also being highly overrated on name value alone in this thread tbh.... that secondary is an embarrassment and the playcalling is ful, especially in clutch time....
True, but it's much easier for me to envision CHI or SF winning at ATL in the playoffs then vice-versa. ATL badly needs to hold onto the #1 seed cause they sure as aren't winning on the road.
let me just fix that real quick
AFC (revised):
1. Texans
2. Ravens
3. Broncos
4. Patriots
5. Bengals
16. San Diego Chokejobs
Where would you rank this?
![]()
lol. No wonder everyone on here thinks you're a dumbass.
still 11 weeks to go,
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)