Reply With Quote
in before the lock
who won?
in before the lock
hey bull dike lover....my won...here's the anthem..sang this wit me
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=uJVn2BdxSJI
Goldman Sachs
romney won but still not enough to turn the momentum around imho, obama will win reelection at the end of day
I didn't watch but given this was a foreign policy debate between candidates who have an almost identical foreign policy, I'm fairly confident in the Draw/Neither option. God bless.
Obama won, foreign policy isn't Romney's strong suit & it was more evident tonight then ever.
Barry won simply because Willard cried like a at the end, tbh...
"Shut up , I'm tryna talk"
Clipper Nation, fill me in on why Obama won. I'm asking you since you're the only other person on this site who means it when he scoffs Islamaphobia in this country.
Based on substance alone, neither of those warmongers won, since the "debate" was about how many people we should drone and how many kisses we should lay on Israel's behind, but based on the superficial bull that these debates are judged by, Barry won simply because he had Willard flip-flopping all over the place, trying (and failing) to cover up his ignorance (Willard doesn't even know where Iran is on the map, for example)...
If only Dr. Paul was up on that stage - the whooping he'd have laid on both those fools would have been a watershed moment in politics....
lol Obama "wins" by adopting a Republican foreign policy for the past 4 years
The main reason I didn't watch, I didn't wanna puke in disgust over Obama and Romney competing over which one's head is buried further up Netanyahu's ass.
Lol I cant stand Israel either but Paul had his shot at Romney & he pussed out!
That's an understatement
I thought both pretty much agreed on foreign policy, tbh
republicans and democrats are just the two sides of the same coin on foreign issues imho
neither but Romney gone n embarrassed himself wit dat Iran no access to ocean comment
Obama clearly won the debate tonight. He was more confident on the issues and forthright on his stances. He made Romney look ignorant with the "horses and bayonets" line; probably the best of the night. Romney was far too passive, didn't draw enough contrast, and missed the biggest opportunity to expose Obama on the Libya failure. I also thought that Romney missed an opportunity to expose Obama's weakness on energy independence as a matter of national security.
All that said, Romney did well when bringing it back to the economy, where the president continues to have no credibility. And while I thought Romney was too passive in his style, it was clearly tied to his strategy of seeming the cool, calm and level-headed leader with a pragmatic approach.
I don't know if this debate moves the needle in those key battleground states, but it was clearly an Obama win.
Romney won by changing the subject? Strong.
They definitely agreed on the use of drones but not surprising.
Romney lost on foreign policy and that was the debate's topic.
Gecko can see Iran from each of his mansions.
McLiar/pitbull , Gecko/Ryan, the Repugs are really, really deep in talent.
During tonight’s foreign policy presidential Mitt Romney repeated his attack on President Obama for the U.S. Navy and Air Force are smaller than they were in 1917 and 1947 respectively. This is a “pointless” comparison, as CNN noted recently, explaining that it’s “wrong to assume that fewer ships translates to a weaker military” or fighters for that matter “[b]ecause of the technological supremacy of current Navy ships, the military can get more from each one than it did even 10 to 15 years ago.”
Obama pointed this out during the debate:
OBAMA: But I think Governor Romney maybe hasn’t spent enough time looking at how our military works. You mentioned the Navy, for example, and that we have fewer ships than we did in 1916. Well, Governor, we also have fewer horses and bayonets, because the nature of our military’s changed. We have these things called aircraft carriers, where planes land on them. We have these ships that go underwater, nuclear submarines.
http://thinkprogress.org/security/20...navy-nonsense/
I bet we hear the talking point from Fox, etc how the military is too small, blame it on Barry, because that's how the dumb bubbas think and "analyse". bubbas analyse?
and of course, a bigger MIC always means redistribution of taxpayer $T (aka, taxpayers deeper in debt) to the MIC and its investors, which is really what their game is. Guns over butter, always. We give up butter to buy guns for the MIC.
Obama had some really good daggers in the first half of that debate, but his true personality took over in the second half and he tended to drone on and on.
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)
Posting Permissions
