LmFao!!! Ooooooo sounds like a great idea!!!
LmFao!!! Ooooooo sounds like a great idea!!!
Haha Mike Brown pushes for that trade and we hear about conspiracies.
Kobe would start raping white women again if he saw Bonner was on his team tbh
Trade Bonner for Howard, I'm sure all would go for it.
I'd rather lose Jack at the end of the year than Dwight.
Option A:
Lose Dwight and have $19 Million,Bonner,Blair,Neal,Jackson and Joesph OFF the Spurs Books.
As opposed to
Option B:
Lose Jackson and $10 Million, While Retaining $5 Million, Bonner,Blair,Neal and Joesph ON the Spurs Books.
Not trying to be an ass but why would you chose Option B?
Last edited by LittleCriminal; 11-03-2012 at 05:59 PM.
Not at all. It's a fair question. Most of those guys will end up with some amount of value either as expiring contracts or as trade chips. I'm not any more confident that the Spurs could attract a free agent with all that money freed up than I would be that they could convince Howard to stay in town. Call it bird-in-the-hand paranoia I guess.![]()
And WHY should we listen to you, oh ringless one?![]()
A team would either not do this kind of trade, or they would be forced to do it at much less return value because their superstar was out the door anyway.
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)