Results 1 to 10 of 10
  1. #1
    Veteran InRareForm's Avatar
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    May 2008
    Post Count
    8,644

  2. #2
    Veteran
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    Mar 2009
    Post Count
    97,536
    What bull .

    He didn't mention that the finance sector is buying the top grads in math and physics from all over the planet, taking them out of the Real Economy.

    Capital gains taxed at fixed, not regressive, 15% is not a problem for entrepreneurs, but it is a huge problem for the 99% as the 1% use low/avoided/evaded taxes to ac ulate wealth into the Wall St casino and offshore instead into productive investments and consumption.

    The biggest bull of all:

    "If the I.R.S. taxes their wealth away and distributes it to everyone else, it still won’t help the economy."

    Christensen is nothing but a shill for the 1%.


    Last edited by boutons_deux; 11-05-2012 at 06:30 AM.

  3. #3
    Veteran Wild Cobra's Avatar
    My Team
    Portland Trailblazers
    Join Date
    May 2007
    Post Count
    43,117
    How is any of that going to help the big picture Bout?

  4. #4
    I am that guy RandomGuy's Avatar
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    Jun 2005
    Post Count
    51,121
    That was actually one of the more informative articles I have seen here. Interesting, and thanks.

  5. #5
    Veteran
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    Mar 2009
    Post Count
    97,536

  6. #6
    I am that guy RandomGuy's Avatar
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    Jun 2005
    Post Count
    51,121
    We should instead make capital gains regressive over time, based upon how long the capital is invested in a company. Taxes on short-term investments should continue to be taxed at personal income rates. But the rate should be reduced the longer the investment is held — so that, for example, tax rates on investments held for five years might be zero — and rates on investments held for eight years might be negative.

    Federal tax receipts from capital gains comprise only a tiny percentage of all United States tax revenue. So the near-term impact on the budget will be minimal. But over the longer term, this policy change should have a positive impact on the federal deficit, from taxes paid by companies and their employees that make empowering innovations.

  7. #7
    Veteran
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    Mar 2009
    Post Count
    97,536
    "Federal tax receipts from capital gains comprise only a tiny percentage of all United States tax revenue"

    ... because the Repugs/VRWC got them reduced to 15% from 35% AND tax avoidance/evasion is rampant among the 1% (eg, Bishop Gecko is outstanding example)


    Last edited by boutons_deux; 11-05-2012 at 10:43 AM.

  8. #8
    Mr. John Wayne CosmicCowboy's Avatar
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    Mar 2003
    Post Count
    44,134
    good article

  9. #9
    I am that guy RandomGuy's Avatar
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    Jun 2005
    Post Count
    51,121
    Semi-related bit about "dead" cash:

    http://www.economist.com/news/financ...ts-crisis-dead

    No matter who wins the presidency, we will be looking at low growth until these companies start doing something with that pile.

    Hopefully they will put it into stuff that makes sense in light of the stuff in the OP article.

  10. #10
    Veteran
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    Mar 2009
    Post Count
    97,536
    iow, "cut taxes on me"

Thread Information

Users Browsing this Thread

There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •