Reply With Quote
Just posted on Yahoo, so it's real.
Says 8 states have specific laws forbidding siezure. We need to pass one, but our current Governor probably owes somebody a political favor...
Below is our letter to begin the development process.
Read our letter starting the project here.
Press Release
For Release Monday, June 27 to New Hampshire media
For Release Tuesday, June 28 to all other media
Weare, New Hampshire (PRWEB) Could a hotel be built on the land owned by Supreme Court Justice David H. Souter? A new ruling by the Supreme Court which was supported by Justice Souter himself itself might allow it. A private developer is seeking to use this very law to build a hotel on Souter's land.
Justice Souter's vote in the "Kelo vs. City of New London" decision allows city governments to take land from one private owner and give it to another if the government will generate greater tax revenue or other economic benefits when the land is developed by the new owner.
On Monday June 27, Logan Darrow Clements, faxed a request to Chip Meany the code enforcement officer of the Towne of Weare, New Hampshire seeking to start the application process to build a hotel on 34 Cilley Hill Road. This is the present location of Mr. Souter's home.
Clements, CEO of Freestar Media, LLC, points out that the City of Weare will certainly gain greater tax revenue and economic benefits with a hotel on 34 Cilley Hill Road than allowing Mr. Souter to own the land.
The proposed development, called "The Lost Liberty Hotel" will feature the "Just Desserts Café" and include a museum, open to the public, featuring a permanent exhibit on the loss of freedom in America. Instead of a Gideon's Bible each guest will receive a free copy of Ayn Rand's novel "Atlas Shrugged."
Clements indicated that the hotel must be built on this particular piece of land because it is a unique site being the home of someone largely responsible for destroying property rights for all Americans.
"This is not a prank" said Clements, "The Towne of Weare has five people on the Board of Selectmen. If three of them vote to use the power of eminent domain to take this land from Mr. Souter we can begin our hotel development."
Clements' plan is to raise investment capital from wealthy pro-liberty investors and draw up architectural plans. These plans would then be used to raise investment capital for the project. Clements hopes that regular customers of the hotel might include supporters of the Ins ute For Justice and participants in the Free State Project among others.
# # #
Logan Darrow Clements
Freestar Media, LLC
http://www.freestarmedia.com/hotellostliberty2.html
Just posted on Yahoo, so it's real.
Says 8 states have specific laws forbidding siezure. We need to pass one, but our current Governor probably owes somebody a political favor...
Right on. I hope that passes. Severs the mother ers right. I don't know how the the Court came to that decree, but I hope it goes right back up their asses.
we reap what we sow, i hope he loses his precious land forever
HAHAHA!! Justice!!!!!!
I was shocked at their decision. If I was a home owner i would've felt betrayed.
awesome!
nice.
Haha, that's hilarious.
I hope the legislators here in Texas hurry up and get that state cons utional amendment passed.
I'm embarrassed for our country that the judges we entrust with making the final call on anything legal in this country came to this joke of a ruling.
doubt this would ever happen... but it would serve him right...
The case the SC ruled on was one where the vaste majority of homeowners in the area wanted to sell but a few holdouts were preventing it. SC ruled they could be forced to sell.
It's not as bad of a ruling as it appears.
Sure it is. If only one did not want to sell, it's enough to be a bad ruling.
How could you let something like private ownership get in the way of progress? Don't you want to be a PROGRESSIVE?
Remember when Atlantic City was being developed into casinos? There was that one old couple on the boardwalk that was holding out and didn't want to sell. Money really wasn't the object. They ended up building the casino AROUND the house...I thought that was hilarious...
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)
Posting Permissions
