Results 1 to 6 of 6
  1. #1
    selbstverständlich Agloco's Avatar
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    Jan 2007
    Post Count
    9,014
    http://www.forbes.com/sites/jamescon...ot-a-big-deal/

    The United Nations Scientific Committee on the Effects of Atomic Radiation (UNSCEAR) (UNSCEAR 2012) submitted the report that, among other things, states that uncertainties at low doses are such that UNSCEAR “does not recommend multiplying low doses by large numbers of individuals to estimate numbers of radiation-induced health effects within a population exposed to incremental doses at levels equivalent to or below natural background levels.” (UNDOC/V1255385)
    An interesting find that corroborates what I've observed in the region of Fukushima and northward. Beware of the hotspots though......

  2. #2
    dangerous floater Winehole23's Avatar
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    Nov 2008
    Post Count
    90,214
    does the report address hotspots?

  3. #3
    Moss is Da Sauce! mouse's Avatar
    My Team
    Dallas Mavericks
    Join Date
    Mar 2003
    Post Count
    26,358
    How about you eat nothing but imported food
    From that area for one year and then gives us your expert opinion?

  4. #4
    selbstverständlich Agloco's Avatar
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    Jan 2007
    Post Count
    9,014
    does the report address hotspots?
    Ah, tis good to hear from you again WH. How is your music treating you?

    It would appear that the interim report does not address them directly, but the final report will (unless I overlooked something, which is a distinct possibility since I have 3 glasses of Marnier on board).

    http://www.unscear.org/unscear/en/fukushima.html - Second bullet point.

    The studies being conducted currently are contained in Chapter 2, Section B, Paragraph 9. There are three distinct studies which follow the population, one examining foodstuffs, and one which investigates the local fauna/flora. Hotspots may well be revealed as an incidental find in the latter two.

    http://www.un.org/ga/search/view_doc.asp?symbol=A/67/46

    Methinks that the main thrust of this report was to clarify any misconceptions which may arise in low dose exposure studies and to lay out the radiobiologic principles which underlie them. This report backs up the 2007 ICRP report which asserts that collective effective dose is not an appropriate metric for assessing epidemiological risk. If one subjects recent studies to an appropriate level of scrutiny, it becomes obvious that many of them distract from the real issue: Identifying and decontaminating hotspots.

    Rest assured, I'll be taking more than a cursory glance at the final report.

  5. #5
    dangerous floater Winehole23's Avatar
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    Nov 2008
    Post Count
    90,214
    ]Ah, tis good to hear from you again WH. How is your music treating you?
    Practicing daily. Improvement, yes, but excellence still eludes me. I do enjoy it, so I'll keep doing it.

  6. #6
    The Boognish FuzzyLumpkins's Avatar
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    Jul 2005
    Post Count
    22,830
    Practicing daily. Improvement, yes, but excellence still eludes me. I do enjoy it, so I'll keep doing it.
    If you enjoy it then it's excellent. At least that is what I would think.

Thread Information

Users Browsing this Thread

There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •