I hope this isn't a current realization. He should have never been elected president to begin with.
Its just crazy how he isn't taking any heat on benghazi
I hope this isn't a current realization. He should have never been elected president to begin with.
Because he's not a citizen!
I didn't know you think that.
No Chump Monkey. That is not the reason.
I didn't know you were too stupid to realize what the italics mean.
Can't wait to hear your whiny attempt to not be racist.No Chump Monkey. That is not the reason.
I knew exactly what you meant Dumb Chump.
I see...
Your bigotry means anytime someone says something bad about someone that has dark skin, they are a racist...
That's your bigotry. Not mine.
Go back to discussions before the 2008 elections. I outlined all kinds of reasons why he wasn't qualified. It was primarily because he had no executive experience.
Watching Republicans freak out about Benghazi is hilarious. Sorry but most of the country doesn't give a .
You right-wing dumb s still trying to slander Barry with Benghazi? As if he were personally responsible for making Benghazi security decisions?
Repugs cut $300M from state dept security budget.
The Benghazi security and attack would have occurred exactly the same under Bishop Gecko/Ryan, and you dumb s wouldn't chirp a peep.
Can someone explain how the administration is responsible for security at benghazi? I don't get all the fuss over it.
This administration is much better at preventing terrorist attacks than our last administration that allowed a certain domestic terrorist attack on a certain two towers was![]()
Barry is a turd, but the fact that he won re-election fairly easily and his party won extra seats in both chambers of Congress, speaks volumes of the state of the opposing party. If you want to figure out what's broken, you need to start looking there.
I don't understand what is funny about your comment
lol slowly ripping up t he cons ution.....
My comment itself wasn't funny, what's funny is the Republican party being up in arms over Benghazi and hoping it would be the issue that sank him in the 2012 election when their last president allowed a large scale domestic terrorist attack and when Americans don't give a about Benghazi at all. Most Americans are of the mindset that if we can keep terrorist attacks on the other side of the world and away from America, that's good enough.
Because the administration had 8 hours to send help, and they just didn't. They even had warning this might happen and again, did nothing.
Its people like you that will be the down fall of this country. Anyone who "doesn't give a " doesn't realize things like that actually have an effect on us. If this administration is either to oblivious or they just didn't care to realize what was going on, then we are in reeeaaal trouble. This administration did NOTHING to prevent this. When they knew what was going on, they did NOTHING to help. The people being attacked gave request after request to get help, but the administration just said no. They could have easily saved lives and should be held responsible. If this were the Bush Administration we would be talking about impeachment orders. But since so many people are for some reason on Obamas , it wont happen.
So you subscribe to the incompetence storyline... you're of no use to Galileo, tbh
False. How many Americans died on the useless Iraq war and where was the talk of impeachment orders then?
Sorry i didnt feel the need to type out every detail to someone who didn't even know how this is the administrations fault, feel free to do so.
I'm in agreement this was a up and somebody should've paid the price. If not Barry, somebody else.
Thats also a little different, first of all the president doesn't make the final choice to go to war. Also its war, people die, not saying thats good, or that bush was a good president. But thats what comes with war. These people were under attack in a WAR ZONE, and the Obama administration felt in would be ok to send only 3 marines with our ambassador, then ignore every request to get help...
So how would the impeachment read?
List the charges.
The person ultimately responsible for Benghazi is Obama, but the person immediately responsible is Hilary Clinton. I was stunned that she was able to dodge the media in the immediate aftermath of Benghazi. I understand wholly that later she was sick and then had a concussion, etc. etc. I mean in the immediate aftermath of it, when she successfully avoided having to talk to the media, is what I am referring to.
At the time, the GOP was so intent on holding Barry responsible and making it into something it wasn't, that that Hilary got away with it.
If she ever does decide to run for President, I think it will be hung around her neck like an anchor. I can't imagine that she would even consider running after this.
There is nothing for impeachment of Obama in this, but he should have made sure that somebody was held personally responsible.
The only thing that would be impeachable would be if he (Obama) somehow committed a crime in the process. There is no indication that that is the case, so any hullaballoo about impeachment is just over-the-top screaming with no real impact.
Considering how many people were fired because of the negligence leading up to the 9/11 attacks, I'm going to say nothing will happen here either.
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)