Page 1 of 8 12345 ... LastLast
Results 1 to 25 of 200
  1. #1
    5. timvp's Avatar
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    Feb 2003
    Post Count
    59,905
    The San Antonio Spurs will likely move forward DeJuan Blair close to the deadline, ultimately accepting the best final offer for him, sources said. Blair has wanted a trade for more than a year, and clearly will not re-sign with the Spurs as a free agent this summer.

    The Spurs had tried to canvass the market for a first-round pick, but have relented on that demand. The Spurs could get a second-round pick, or perhaps a player on an expiring deal in return.


    http://sports.yahoo.com/news/nba--nb...GlvbnM-;_ylv=3



    It's not surprising news but Yahoo is more plugged in than any media outlet so this is a notable update.

    I'm not sure I love the idea of trading Blair for a late second round pick. I'd rather the Spurs just keep Blair.

    For a decent prospect or an early second round pick? Yeah, might as well cash in. IMO, the Spurs need to target a second round pick that is at least in the 40-45 range ... and that's assuming Aron Baynes is progressing to the point that he can be decent depth by playoff time.

    Blair doesn't hold much value anymore due to knees and lack of development but he has some value.

  2. #2
    Veteran Mel_13's Avatar
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    Jul 2006
    Post Count
    14,367
    To a team with a trade exception, I'd move Blair for a top-55 protected 2019 second round pick. I'd rather have the roster space and the room under the luxury tax. That way they can sign a player bought out by his team or a free agent like Donte Greene.

  3. #3
    Veteran Richie's Avatar
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    Feb 2012
    Post Count
    2,989
    Would it be unreasonable to trade up a few places in the draft for Blair? i.e. Blair + Spurs first (#30) for a pick expected to be in #22-#26 range?

  4. #4
    5. timvp's Avatar
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    Feb 2003
    Post Count
    59,905
    To a team with a trade exception, I'd move Blair for a top-55 protected 2019 second round pick. I'd rather have the roster space and the room under the luxury tax. That way they can sign a player bought out by his team or a free agent like Donte Greene.
    I haven't studied the likely buyout market but I think Blair holds more value than the cost of his contract. I'd just hold onto him if that's the best the Spurs can get. Hypothetically, if the Spurs suffer an injury in the playoffs, Blair would at least know what he's supposed to do and his teammates know how to play with him.

    If a player becomes available who would bring more value than Blair, the Spurs could waive Blair and there's a decent to good chance that he'll get claimed off of waivers ... and that would serve the same purpose as salary dumping him at the trade deadline.

  5. #5
    The Dude minds DPG21920's Avatar
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    Jun 2008
    Post Count
    77,863
    I don't know about the other deals being discussed, but if the Spurs don't trade Blair it wont be for a lack of trying. They are trying to move. It just depends on whether or not they are moving him regardless and just take the best offer (whatever that may be) or if they value Blair enough and dont get an offer they like they just hold him then.
    Not surprising what Woj is reporting - pretty well known that was the likely course of action, but I have to agree with Timvp. With Blair showing some lift lately he is worth more to the Spurs now than his contract shows and worth more than a late 2nd rounder. I hope he is not traded for that.

  6. #6
    Veteran Mel_13's Avatar
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    Jul 2006
    Post Count
    14,367
    I haven't studied the likely buyout market but I think Blair holds more value than the cost of his contract. I'd just hold onto him if that's the best the Spurs can get. Hypothetically, if the Spurs suffer an injury in the playoffs, Blair would at least know what he's supposed to do and his teammates know how to play with him.

    If a player becomes available who would bring more value than Blair, the Spurs could waive Blair and there's a decent to good chance that he'll get claimed off of waivers ... and that would serve the same purpose as salary dumping him at the trade deadline.
    I don't see the Spurs betting their position with respect to the luxury tax line on that proposition. If they're going to have the flexibility to add a player after the deadline, I believe they'll have to offload Blair before the deadline.

  7. #7
    Machacarredes Chinook's Avatar
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    Oct 2012
    Post Count
    32,115
    We've gone over this a few times in the past few weeks, but moving Blair for a trade exception would allow for the Spurs to take back more salary in a draft-night trade. It could be the difference between getting a player for $4.6 Million for Bonner's deal or getting a player for $5.2 Million. There are a number of interesting players whose salaries lie in that gap.

  8. #8
    Believe. Em-City's Avatar
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    Aug 2009
    Post Count
    1,084
    It could be a situation of addition by subtraction... maybe no blair will mean baynes gets an opportunity. highly unlikely i know, but perhaps he could work himself into a situation where he has playoff impact.

  9. #9
    🏆🏆🏆🏆🏆 ElNono's Avatar
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    Apr 2007
    Post Count
    153,473
    I haven't studied the likely buyout market but I think Blair holds more value than the cost of his contract. I'd just hold onto him if that's the best the Spurs can get. Hypothetically, if the Spurs suffer an injury in the playoffs, Blair would at least know what he's supposed to do and his teammates know how to play with him.

    If a player becomes available who would bring more value than Blair, the Spurs could waive Blair and there's a decent to good chance that he'll get claimed off of waivers ... and that would serve the same purpose as salary dumping him at the trade deadline.
    A lot of times he makes you wonder if that's true at all... In theory it should be, in practice it seems to me the misses are much more common than the hits.

  10. #10
    Ridding the world of Alien Scum...Relentlessly. Man In Black's Avatar
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    Apr 2003
    Post Count
    4,390
    Isn't Johnny Ludden still the Head Sports Editor for NBA there at Yahoo? Perhaps that's why they are so connected to the team.

  11. #11
    Kiwi, Advanced Stat Fan
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    Jun 2007
    Post Count
    1,146
    Blair definitely is worth his contract, and if it's a #50 pick, it should be a no. The insurance depth is worth more than that.

    If he is traded, I hope it's to a team where he can play. I don't think he's as good as our other options, but he is better than a lot of bigs in this league, and he deserves to be playing.

  12. #12
    Duncan 'til I die admiralfats's Avatar
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    May 2008
    Post Count
    212
    i don't know if it bothers the guys, but dejuan is definitely the least content with his role guy on the team. everyone else, i think, is filling a role they're happy with, or at least not unhappy with. but dejuan lost the start role, and his friend george was traded away, and i just wonder if it could possibly be helpful to let him move on. Obviously it's not killing the team chemistry, but it probably won't hurt to let him go. Anything we get for him is fine. His value is almost definitely higher than his contract, but maybe not for us. He sometimes gives us a few minutes of good play on offense. he just can't find a place on the floor for us. He can find a role for some lesser team (or a team with no bigs), and I wish him the best.

  13. #13
    Five. DesignatedT's Avatar
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    Jun 2008
    Post Count
    20,362
    We all know Blair is gone after this year but just in case for some horrible reason another big is needed at some point during the playoff run it would still be nice to have him on the bench. For that reason I wouldn't give him up for just a late 2nd rounder.

  14. #14
    Duncan 'til I die admiralfats's Avatar
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    May 2008
    Post Count
    212
    i know i'm the only person on this forum that feels this way, but i'd be okay with bonner playing those minutes

  15. #15
    bandwagon hater
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    May 2005
    Post Count
    8,385
    I like Blair, but he doesn't help the Spurs much as a player, he plays well but he doesn't really add anything that we cant get from other players. To me it's a lateral move at worst. It wont hurt the Spurs if we let him go. I wish him luck if he gets the boot and look forward to seeing him do well on another team like George Hill is doing. Dejaun is a niche player, He is good for certain situations, hopefully he finds a team that requires his skills.
    Last edited by phyzik; 02-20-2013 at 12:35 AM.

  16. #16
    Vegas Strong Darkwaters's Avatar
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    Apr 2006
    Post Count
    7,706
    Dejuan's going to find out that it isn't so easy to score in the NBA without Manu Ginobili and Tony Parker passing you the ball.

  17. #17
    Believe.
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    Jun 2009
    Post Count
    680
    i don't know if it bothers the guys, but dejuan is definitely the least content with his role guy on the team. everyone else, i think, is filling a role they're happy with, or at least not unhappy with. but dejuan lost the start role, and his friend george was traded away, and i just wonder if it could possibly be helpful to let him move on. Obviously it's not killing the team chemistry, but it probably won't hurt to let him go. Anything we get for him is fine. His value is almost definitely higher than his contract, but maybe not for us. He sometimes gives us a few minutes of good play on offense. he just can't find a place on the floor for us. He can find a role for some lesser team (or a team with no bigs), and I wish him the best.
    Any game that Blair got a C for his defense is a game he played above his capability. That means on an average night, he has to get B+ on offense to not hurt the team.

  18. #18
    Shootin' like Ed O'Bannon Darius McCrary's Avatar
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    Oct 2009
    Post Count
    2,684
    Will be sad to see him go. He's a winner, and a good guy.

  19. #19
    Veteran dunkman's Avatar
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    Jul 2005
    Post Count
    3,408
    Baynes has more upside, he's a 7 footer. Hope the Spurs get a first rounder and sign K-Mart, if still available, for the rest of the season.

  20. #20
    No Spurs No DrunkTXLabrat's Avatar
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    Sep 2012
    Post Count
    1,867
    Would it be unreasonable to trade up a few places in the draft for Blair? i.e. Blair + Spurs first (#30) for a pick expected to be in #22-#26 range?
    that's a good idea

  21. #21
    Savvy Veteran spurraider21's Avatar
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    Apr 2012
    Post Count
    100,825
    If we aren't even getting a top half second rounder its not worth trading him. At that point he's just ridiculously cheap depth who can occasionally provide a spark

  22. #22
    Less is More Darius Bieber's Avatar
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    Jan 2012
    Post Count
    6,559
    Even with the hate surrounding Blair, it'll be hard to see a Spur product leave the organization. On the other hand, the departure of Jefferson seemed to happen flawlessly.

  23. #23
    🏆🏆🏆🏆🏆 ElNono's Avatar
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    Apr 2007
    Post Count
    153,473
    As predicted, other teams likely when asked for a 1st round pick... right now Blair is good enough to backup Chuck Hayes in the Seattle Kings... IMO, it's also clear Pop is rolling with Bonner/small-ball for the playoffs.

    Blair is a good kid, but he never developed his game into anything, weight problems, and now knee problems have to be a major red flag, so if we can rob some team of a 2nd round pick for DeJuan, you do it

  24. #24
    Five. DesignatedT's Avatar
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    Jun 2008
    Post Count
    20,362
    Just because Bonner plays vs the Kings doesn't mean Pop is playing him in the playoffs . Of course Pop is going to use his depth against a team like Sacramento. Who is stupid enough to run their players into the ground at this stage in the season? Even if the guys off the bench are playing ty you don't change your plan/philosophy.

  25. #25
    Set for life Budkin's Avatar
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    May 2005
    Post Count
    22,652
    If we aren't even getting a top half second rounder its not worth trading him. At that point he's just ridiculously cheap depth who can occasionally provide a spark
    This. It would be more valuable to keep him through the playoffs than to just give him away for free.

Thread Information

Users Browsing this Thread

There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •