Hmm... it seems that the price is higher to bring Scola this summer.
Let's run some numbers, shall we?
Tau Ceramica has a very hard-line president, and he will not concede anything. He would be more than happy to have Scola playing for Tau another year. If the Spurs want Scola now, he (Scola the player, NOT the Spurs or anyone else) has to pay the full 2M Euros NOW.
The total money in cash would be 2.387M roughly ~2.4M. Teams can provide 350K for contract buyouts. Teams can also provide a cash bonus to the player, that I think it could be around 400K (this is how the Spurs managed to pay Manu's 750K contract buyout). I am not sure if this money can be payed to the player in one lump sum, or if should be payed over a certain period of time (like in the first 12 months). Someone should research this issue. Let's be optimistic and assume that it could be payed in one lump sum (still this money is taxable!).
Players earning millions of dollars are in the very high income brackets. They should pay around 45% in taxes. This includes both federal and state taxes, the state taxes are prorated among all the states they play during the year. Since Scola will play half the game in Texas with no state income tax, it may be a little less, but not much less (most of the 45% are Federal taxes anyway). Let's be conservative and assume 45%.
So...
+2.400M -- total contract buyout
-0.350M -- cash for buyout
----------
+2.05M
Assuming the 45% in taxes owed to the Federal and State goverments on income, and assuming 100K of living expenses for the first year, the Spurs should pay Scola in the first year of his contract:
remaing of buyout + 1 year living expenses = (1st year salary + cash bonus) * 55% after taxes
2.05 + 0.10 = (1st year salary + 0.40) * 0.55
1st year salary = 3.51M
We are not done yet. Players usually receive a pro-rated part of their salary with a check every 15 days. I don't know the rules, but in the case of Scola's buyout, he should receive at least 2.05M up front to have enough equity to pay the buyout. Furthermore, I think the Federal goverment will want some of that money up front as well if it is provided in one big lump sum, so the Spurs may need to pay him the full 3.51M (+ the 400K bonus).
Now, there are other options. Scola could apply for a loan using the Spurs guaranteed contract as collateral. The problem is that Scola is a foreigner with no credit history in the States, so the interest would be quite hefty. Private lenders could easily ask him 20% APR per year. The Spurs FO may work something out for him though. Let's assume they get him a 10% APR via one of Holt's bankers' friends for 3 years. He would be paying 60K per month in principal + interest assuming no extra fees, or $720K per year. Assuming he would like to get at least 1M per year net on his pocket (the equivalent of an LLE contract after taxes), the Spurs should be paying him a contract in his first year of roughly:
1st year contract = LLE + loan payment = 1.8M + 0.72M
1st year contract = 2.5M
So the Spurs would have to offer him something in the order of 2.5M -- 3.5M range in the first year to bring Scola in this summer. If I run the numbers correctly, this clearly indicates that the LLE is certainly NOT sufficient, and the Spurs would be using at least half of the MLE if they plan to bring him in this year. Of course, this conclusion is only correct if my assumptions are valid.