Reply With Quote
Cool, hopefully he's telling his players that.
from the post game conference
Cool, hopefully he's telling his players that.
They were missing layups for a reason.
There will be people who see tim's low point total and say he had a bad game. But Tim was a major disruption in in the paint. He can let other people score, just play D like that the whole series Timmy and we'll be fine.
After a blowout win, you just hope the opposing coach will say something like this.
LOL the idiot couldn't even remember one of his players name..
affirmative action ftw
Duncan passing the ball to other teammates(4 asst), took care of the D in the middle
Avery Johnson esqu post game FTW
black coach
no he said, theres some plays where the grizz couldnt make layups/easy baskets at the rim and spurs had nothing to do with them missing those layups
he gave credit to the spurs d and that they didnt play well
To be fair, they did miss some shots they would normally make. Spurs D was very locked-in and tough, though.
This guy couldn't even remember Bayless' name.
Spurs packed the paint and dared them to shoot from the outside.
This guy couldn't even remember Bayless' name.
Hollins apparently didn't expect solid interior defense.
Dude is as s shocked as Zach Randolph when he got yanked at the end of the game.
He's a dinosaur who's at odds with his advanced stat driven front office. I don't see him there for the long run. One of the reasons they traded Gay was that Hollins insisted on playing him to close out games ,when advanced stats said they were WAY worse defensively with him on the floor instead of Allen, and no better on offense. Reminded me of Moneyball when Beane traded that guy that Howe kept playing in front of their walk-drawing first base candidate.
It's a little more difficult adjusting in this series than it was against Vinny Del Negro and Scott Brooks, tbh
all our bigs were in single-pt scoring
Duncan 6
Splitter 1
Diaw 2
Blair 6
D?
Pop needs to take this fool to the wood shed in 5.
If he' really convinced of that then it's an early out for the Fizzlies. But I think they're thoroughly embarrased and next game they want a TKO by halftime. Gonna be an interesting game 2.
Looks like he got his scouting reports from ESPN, who seems to think this is the 2011 defense and the 2004 offense.
Tbh, Pena was much better than Scott Hatteburg and imo had little to nothing to do with them playing better. Pena's career also lasted much longer (he's still playing now a dozen years later) and is much better defensively. Trading Pena just to play Hatteburg was pretty much his worst move.He's a dinosaur who's at odds with his advanced stat driven front office. I don't see him there for the long run. One of the reasons they traded Gay was that Hollins insisted on playing him to close out games ,when advanced stats said they were WAY worse defensively with him on the floor instead of Allen, and no better on offense. Reminded me of Moneyball when Beane traded that guy that Howe kept playing in front of their walk-drawing first base candidate.
I totally get what you're saying (it's right), but that's a bad example. :P
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)
Posting Permissions
