I'll take his 7 points. Who else is going to be in there?
Averaged:
19.3 minutes LAL series
15.3 minutes GSW series
12.8 minutes MEM series
22 minutes tonight. Defended Ray Allen primarily.
Stats:
3-9FG 1-5 3PFG 2 REB 1 AST +7 7 PTS
I don't have the tools but I swear he must have been -10 in the first half.
WTF was up with Pop? He obviously saw something higher level that demanded Neal play.
Did he really think CoJo sucks that badly? I bet my balls that CoJo doesn't get caught on those screens and leave Ray Allen open. Furthermore, if Neal continues to suck s**t, Pop has potentially burned a card by ruining Joseph's confidence.
So, My question to Spurstalk:
WTF?
I'll take his 7 points. Who else is going to be in there?
Neal must have a Pop sex tape or something like that.
He is one of the worst players in the NBA and gets minutes here![]()
He contributed to the victory by playing solid minutes. The Spurs won. So WTF is the problem?
My guess is that with the Heat trying to get the ball out of Tony's hands Pop wants to have as many playmakers/shotmakers on the floor as much as possible and he considers Neal to be just that.
But then under that logic is inexplicable that Bonner plays over Diaw.
You swear he must have been -10 in the first half.
And by the end? +7...third highest on team.
The Neal bashing is hilarious. Only forum in sports history who, after a huge win (with help from a clutch jumper and 3 pointer from said man in second half) bashes on the very same guy for his deficiencies.
No Freaking way!!!
Neal almost singlehandedly lost us the game in the 1st half by leaving Ray Allen open for 2 threes.
First half he:
Hesitated on a three
Hit a 2
Hesitated on another three
Took a ludicrous three
Yet Pop still played him, even in crunch time.
I don't buy the "We won so every decision was correct" GNSF BS
Again, my point about ruining CoJo's confidence
I'll keep this thread bumped until a true BNSF answers
He was -1 in the first half, FYI. I wasn't happy that he was in the game so much either, but a part of that was Kawhi's foul trouble in the first half, so we needed another guard in the rotation. I think the reason he got longer run than Joseph is because Cory was -6 in like 2 minutes in the first half. This stage might be too much for him. He really hasn't been a playmaker at all the last round and was basically just giving it to Manu every time and playing off-guard. If a point is going to do that, then Pop will bench him because Neal is a better off-guard than Cory.
In the second half, Neal wasn't doing much except for making a big three there, but he actually guarded Allen pretty good, and Pop wasn't about to change anything when a lineup was making a good run at that point. Eventually he subbed in Green for him, and the Spurs went with their top small-ball lineup down the stretch.
If the Spurs are gonna play small a lot though, then Neal has to play some because it's not like Kawhi-Green-Manu-Tony will play 48 minutes.
As far as the backup point goes, I think that's basically Manu at this point. We'll see if the Heat start trying to pressure his dribble and trap him full-court. I predict they'll attempt something like that in Game 2.
CoJo isn't going to develop into anything. Who cares.
In fact, it's nice to see a coach who actually stands behind his players through thick and thin.
Fine, he has been injured and had a down year. So what?
He has been clutch before, and Pop knows he has the ability to be clutch again.
Let the genius coach.
Besides, it's not like there are a plethora of better options out there.
The guy is making almost minimum NBA wage, and still goes out there every night with a fire in his eye.
3-9 shooting is 3-9 shooting. That is not good enough. This is an instance where +/- is a bad stat to bring up. With that being said, the shots he did make look pretty nice so I'm hoping his shooting stroke can actually improve as this series goes on.
At the end of the day, Neal was +7 and the Spurs had a W.
Foul trouble maybe played a part in it early but Pop must of like what he saw out of him to keep going to him late.
not only neal, but why does ginobli leave ray allen and miller to double? do these mfs not know who ray allen and mike miller are?
Someone who gets it....CO-SIGNED
They have to guard him even if he isn't shooting well. With CoJo in his place the Heat would have constantly doubled off of him and it would have made the Spurs offense worse overall. Besides his D wasn't as bad as people are suggesting.
Neal was awful tonight.
Neal did play too many minutes. I was pissed off during the game because Ray Allen was getting open shots, but ultimately Gary was able to contribute a bit.
He's a role player, we have to remember. He's not perfect, and some aspects of his game a better than others. He should play in a more limited role if possible. I wouldn't mind splitting some of his minutes with Patty mills if Kawhi or Danny get into foul trouble again (which is likely).
made 2 timely threes..
The whole time I found myself saying "well, who the else is Pop going to play".
Pop experimented with Joseph, and to me it seemed like it went well, but I guess that's why I'm not the head coach of the best team in basketball. Props to Pop for sticking with Gary, even though it didn't feel right, as I said earlier, it was something that worked in the match up tonight. GSG GSG GSG!
He made one 3, and a midrange jumper before it.
Neal was awful in the first half, but better in the second half
started off ty. made some huge shots win nobody else was. job done.
I cringed like everyone else when Neal entered the game, but I was pleasantly surprised. He made massive errors defensively, but wasn't the disaster that he usually is on that end. Offensively, I liked what I saw. His shooting was obviously rusty but most of his shots were decent looks and in rhythm. He's a player who can benefit from Miami's over aggression as he's more than comfortable being run off the three point line into midrange. Danny, Bonner, Diaw and Joseph are not as comfortable at adjusting their shots on the fly.
roll player defined.
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)