I remember that was the whole plan in the first place. It would be interesting to see which backcourt would've been the most successful Parker/Kidd or Parker/Ginobili?
So apparently the Spurs wanted to get Kidd AND keep Parker, not trade him. I never knew that:
http://www.nytimes.com/2013/06/07/sp...ref=basketball
I remember that was the whole plan in the first place. It would be interesting to see which backcourt would've been the most successful Parker/Kidd or Parker/Ginobili?
Woj wrote an article about this just yesterday...
http://sports.yahoo.com/news/nba--te...060105541.html
One major problem with a Parker/Kidd backcourt: at the time, neither one could shoot.
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)