Reply With Quote
If it involved Diaw and 1st rounder it wouldn't be worth it. For Bonner and a future 1st...
If it involved Diaw and 1st rounder it wouldn't be worth it. For Bonner and a future 1st...
I would have done a Bonner for Scola trade.
Bonner and a 1st for Scola? no.
Scola = empty stats.
Oh man, HERE WE GO.
Yea bummer.
Being intrigued doesn't mean they ever offered anything.
Bonner and De Colo? Sure. Bonner plus a first? No thanks.
agree here.
i might have added de colo with bonner to entice them.
I would do Bonner + 2014 1st in a heart-beat. Too bad the FO wouldn't
lol 10 years and we still can't get over it lol.
Pretty obvious the Suns wanted a first. Scola isn't worth that.
At least 5 years to late.
Bonner straight up would be the only trade I'd agree with.
Diaw straight up? NO, as Diaw's versatility is a big thing for us!
Any of our guards doesn't make sense balance wise!
Picks? NO!
Spurs first rounder next year won't be worth a ton. It will be in the last part of the first round. Not a ton to give up IMO for a guy you believe can put you over the top. Think of it like Bonner + Livio Charles for Scola. No one would have a major issue with that.
He's with the Pacers now. Time to move on. No point in making a thread for Scola now. Dude will have little value left when he's available again.
Not that I would have done it, but for the right player I don't think giving up a late first next year is a major deal.
Also, again, this makes no sense. Why forgo cap space & give a guy like Pendergrapgh money if you still want another big
This is the only contender I've ever seen that almost never get's what they want. For one reason or another, they almost always lose out and have to settle.
Scola is absolutely worth a 27-30 pick, if you see him as the piece that puts them over the top . . . I'm not sure if he would be, but I'd have done it in a second, because he can effectively eat up a lot of regular season minutes and he at least makes the Thunder/Heat limit the amount of time they play Durant/James at PF. As we saw in the Pacers series, even with a flawed roster, if you can limit the Heat in particular from doing that (since it's so central to their iden y), they all of a sudden don't look so unbeatable. The Spurs need an answer to those two going small at will against them.
This is an outstanding trade for the Pacers. Now, between Hibbert, West and Scola, the Heat don't get to rest or play their preferred lineups without their being a tradeoff/consequences.
Cue the WHY DID WE GET RID OF SCOLA discussion all over again.
Don't understand what the Spurs are doing. I thought they signed Pendergraph because they thought he'd be the back-up center. Now they are still waiting on a word from Oden, now they were interested in Scola. I wonder if the Spurs have a plan at all.
Last edited by chrhawk; 07-27-2013 at 04:43 PM.
Damn pacers doin thangs
Actually, the Pacers also gave up Plumlee. So in essence, they traded Green and two firsts for Scola. That's a pretty high price to pay, and I'm glad the Spurs didn't pay it.
I agree about the second part, though. I have no idea what the Spurs are doing.
scola is not worth it now
undersized and oden is coming monday
Oden is going to Miami, watch.
Return of Scola thread!!!
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)
Posting Permissions
