somebody ought to have a tea tea party in her pants that useless
I thought WSJ blocks viewing anything past a day.
No clue, but I can read it here. I thought it was a better article, seeing the one in the OP is a little light on details.
Yeah. It is. thanks![]()
good
they need to target the (un)tea party
it needs to be eliminated before those wing ntters destroy what is left of that shathole ry.
Are you craving some amount of attention?
The IRS targeting a group whose sole existence is based around the premise of their hatred of taxes (and are even named after such) for potential abuses of tax-exempt status?
You don't say.
the IRS was doing its job of vetting groups across the political spectrum of fraudulently but successfully claiming "social welfare" tax exempt status. These right-wing groups EXPLODED after their hated n!gg@ was elected and the extremist right-wing SCOTUS gang of 5 said money was protected speech, and corporations were people.
btw, no doubt the Gang of 5 will allow the 1% to rape democracy even more in the McCutcheon case. http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2013/0...n_3678555.html
If she was a robot, sure that would make sense. Stil illegal.
There's also the fact that she blamed two Cincinnati employees and stated she had no knowledge.
Parry, feint, engage, reprise.
Bravo!
They also claim to educate mad old white folk about the cons ution as if they forgot it existed.
Problem is lying about it. If the IRS stated what you did in a sanitized manner, well ok then...
IRS list reveals concerns over Tea Party 'propaganda'
Newly uncovered IRS do ents show the agency flagged political groups based on the content of their literature, raising concerns specifically about "anti-Obama rhetoric," inflammatory language and "emotional" statements made by non-profits seeking tax-exempt status.
The internal 2011 do ents, obtained by USA TODAY, list 162 groups by name, with comments by Internal Revenue Service lawyers in Washington raising issues about their political, lobbying and advocacy activities. In 21 cases, those activities were characterized as "propaganda."
The list provides the most specific public accounting to date of which groups were targeted for extra scrutiny and why. The IRS has not publicly identified the groups, repeatedly citing a provision of the tax code prohibiting it from releasing tax return information.
More than 80% of the organizations on the 2011 "political advocacy case" list were conservative, but the effort to police political activity also ensnared at least 11 liberal groups as of November 2011, including Progressives United, Progress Texas and Delawareans for Social and Economic Justice.
http://www.usatoday.com/story/news/p...ganda/2825003/
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)