Results 1 to 5 of 5
  1. #1
    I want some NASTY! SpurPadre's Avatar
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    Dec 2011
    Post Count
    14,324
    Who likes it? I do and I've been consistent in not ever liking the 2-3-2 format as a team with a lesser record shouldn't be rewarded with 3 straight home games (not that we took full advantage of it when we had that recently). It was more the principle of the matter for me. Now, would 2-2-1-1-1 have made any difference at all in the '13 Finals, mainly the Game 6 chokejob? That's neither here nor there but it's food for thought. Any way, I think it's a change for the best.

  2. #2
    Believe. chrhawk's Avatar
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    Apr 2013
    Post Count
    243
    This was long overdue. I wonder how the finals would've turned out under this current format. I doubt that the Spurs would've had a 3-2 lead going home for Game 6. Either way, the road teams now only have to deal with the pressure of winning one road game instead of two.

  3. #3
    Veteran HI-FI's Avatar
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    May 2012
    Post Count
    13,358
    tbh, it's bull it happened after this past Finals. I wish they would've done this the year before.

    whatever. better late than never, it has been long overdue.

  4. #4
    Believe.
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    Jun 2012
    Post Count
    881
    Frankly...since travel really isn't a 'factor' for teams nowadays, I'd prefer it if it was just a 1-1-1-1-1-1-1 format. That way, the momentum could constantly shift and no team would have a distinct advantage.

    And the team with the better record would still get the 1st, 3rd, 5th, and 7th games at home, so they would still have that.

    I know everyone would say "But what about jet-lag?" and all that, but who cares...spread the games out. Give 3 days in-between each, and jet-lag wont be a factor.

  5. #5
    Don't stop believin' Dex's Avatar
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    Nov 2004
    Post Count
    27,659
    It's not in place yet. It still has to pass a vote from the owners, and even then, may not be implemented immediately.

    That being said, I greatly prefer the 2-2-1-1-1 format. In my opinion, 2-3-2 gives too much of an advantage to the home team. Both teams fight all season and through the playoffs to make it to the Finals. It shouldn't be so skewed in the direction of any one team. 2-2-1-1-1 is the more compe ive format.

    I've also always felt like it was strange for the format to change for the final series, although it didn't seem as odd when the first round was only Best of 5. I also feel like the main reason they switched to 2-3-2, travel, isn't really an issue anymore, and if the cause is no longer valid, there is no reason to continue with the effect.

Thread Information

Users Browsing this Thread

There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •